What if Cummins has a bad day, who takes wickets against India from their side then?It's ridiculous. Bumrah bailed India out in Perth but suppose he doesn't have a good outing in Adelaide, how is the rest of the attack going to take close to 20 wickets own their own? I just don't see-
Siraj + Rana + Reddy + Sundar taking close to 20 wickets. Whereas if the attack without Bumrah was Siraj + Rana + Ashwin + Jadeja, you can still expect 20 wickets.
So India must factor in Bumrah not doing so well. Why only factor in top 6 doing crap and having Nitish Reddy there as backup batter? Why not factor in underperformance from a critical bowler like Bumrah. Otherwise it's basically Bumrah or bust. FTR he only got 2 wickets in Adelaide last time. Going in with 3 genuine wicket takers + 1 half decent inexperienced spinner in Sundar + 1 part timer in Reddy is terribly negative tactics, when you must take 20 wickets.
Seems silly when Ash was the guy who did the most damage in the last pink ball test we played there.What if Cummins has a bad day, who takes wickets against India from their side then?
All team rely on their main player, a certain GOAT Aussie team lost the ashes when Mcgrath stepped on a ball.
Siraj did well last time in Aus too when he had no support, Rana is new but talented, we got to rely on them.
Also how does it make sense to play two spinners in a pink ball test at adelaide, the pitches there are not even known for breaking up later in the tes?
Australia are playing with 4 proper wicket takers, unlike India with just 3 genuine wicket takers. So Australia can afford Cummins not doing so well.What if Cummins has a bad day, who takes wickets against India from their side then?
All team rely on their main player, a certain GOAT Aussie team lost the ashes when Mcgrath stepped on a ball.
Siraj did well last time in Aus too when he had no support, Rana is new but talented, we got to rely on them.
Also how does it make sense to play two spinners in a pink ball test at adelaide, the pitches there are not even known for breaking up later in the tes?
Agreed ash should playAustralia are playing with 4 proper wicket takers, unlike India with just 3 genuine wicket takers. So Australia can afford Cummins not doing so well.
Lyon has a better record with the pink ball than certain pacers. So it's a big misperception that spinners don't take wickets here. Ashwin was the pick of the Indian bowlers last time with the pink ball!
It's not like Nitish Reddy bowling at 120-126 is going to be of any help here. He is there as a batter primarily, so you can have Jadeja as his batting replacement and Jadeja's bowling can be a bonus. And have Ashwin as the main spinner to make use of the overspin.
You don't need the pitch to breakup. The extra bounce / overspin keeps spinners in the game. The drift as well.