You're meant to wait until he gets out before you say that. *nods* Saves you looking stupid if he makes a big score. Of course, I agree that he's not at his best, mind you. Probably our most inconsistent batsman of late, second to Sinclair. I think Sinclair would have averaged the same as McMillan over the years if he were in Macca's place, though. So it's not a huge gain to drop one for the other. Worth a shot, though.Darrin said:
What'd I tell ya? McMillan makes a nifty 43 off 45 to become the batsman that would have gained him "best batter" by marc's ODI prediction forum standards (well, for the NZ innings).Loony BoB said:
mcmillan has played complete rubbish in the test series(and what exactly was he thinking coming down the track 2nd ball to mr negative at lords?). even if he scored 200 against an average county side(sorry LE) i wouldnt consider him for the test match squad.Loony BoB said:
Sure it was Aggers? I'm pretty certain I heard that fool Blofeld say it, but what he doesn't know about cricket would fill a library. It's the sort of line he starts his comentaries off with, which is helpful because it reminds me to turn the radio off for 20 minutes so I won't have to listen to Blofeld's fantasy descriptions of some match taking place only in his own head. I've sat directly below him and not been able to see any of what he appears to believe is going on too often to take him seriously about anything other than his own protestations of ignorance.Tim said:
What does age have to do with winning it? what we'd make up in youth we'd lose in experience.chris.hinton said:
Average county side?tooextracool said:
That'd be silly.marc71178 said:
and butler gets smacked all over the park.....Craig said:
Not just Butler. There wasn't a single New Zealand bowler who emerged from the game with any credit.tooextracool said:
