Seems a bit unnecessary for me I don't think they will look to enforce the follow on as it would be asking too much of their bowlers. Perhaps they are looking to grind England into the dust ala Border in 89.Somerset said:Personally I doubt they will though. I get the impression Australia will look to make as many as possible and look to declare about an hour after tea.
Although Warne has just gone to Harmison so that might change their approach.
How demoralising would it be if Stuart Clark and Glen McGrath batted for an hour after tea though? I think that would inflict a fair bit of damage on the English.chalky said:Seems a bit unnecessary for me I don't think they will look to enforce the follow on as it would be asking too much of their bowlers. Perhaps they are looking to grind England into the dust ala Border in 89.
I don't think England can get much more demorilised TBH. Though they will probably bat a bit longer than they should for the same reasons Border in 89.Somerset said:How demoralising would it be if Stuart Clark and Glen McGrath batted for an hour after tea though? I think that would inflict a fair bit of damage on the English.
Harmison immediately looks better although wasn't helped by Freddie there!! More bouncers against Lee to come I imagine.
Clarke on 49 and one short of a deserved fifty.
Ponting usually does, to be honest. But I don't think there's any great cost to doing it here.chalky said:I don't think England can get much more demorilised TBH. Though they will probably bat a bit longer than they should for the same reasons Border in 89.
Reading what most of Aussie posters have wrote on here they believe Watson is a better first class batsmen than Clarke add to that his bowling if fit Watson should really play over him. The battle for me should be with Martyn, with him Langer, Hayden & Gilchrist all in their mid 30's and probably past their peeks it might be worth getting some younger blood in and avoid the situation of losing 3 or 4 players in one year.pasag said:Prety big selection quandry for the selectors with Clarke out on 56 as he probably won't bat again in the match. Will be interesting. Anderson deserved a wicket for his efforts imo.
I don't think Watson is a better batsman than Clarke, but he does have a much better record. Clarke averages around 40 in FC cricket compared to Watson who is at a shade under 50. Clarke is more likely to be a world class batsman in the future IMO, but Watson's bowling should definitely see him picked, especially if they go for two spinners in Adelaide. In fact, if they go for two spinners, he's a certainty. As you say, Martyn and Clarke fighting for the other spot.chalky said:Reading what most of Aussie posters have wrote on here they believe Watson is a better first class batsmen than Clarke add to that his bowling if fit Watson should really play over him. The battle for me should be with Martyn, with him Langer, Hayden & Gilchrist all in their mid 30's and probably past their peeks it might be worth getting some younger blood in and avoid the situation of losing 3 or 4 players in one year.
Yeah, I have no idea what will happen there. Needed more (or a not out) to feel safer, that's for sure, and his method of dismissal wasn't that unfamiliar. Might still get an opening if he's dropped for Watson and Marto fails at Adelaide.pasag said:Prety big selection quandry for the selectors with Clarke out on 56 as he probably won't bat again in the match. Will be interesting. Anderson deserved a wicket for his efforts imo.
Yeah, atrocious behaviour from the cops there. There was nothing at all wrong with the crowd behaviour, and the typical desire to crack down on random crap when there's no proper work to do is just disgraceful.Slow Love™ said:I was just reading that the cops have been really over-militant so far, and threw out the barmy army's bugler yesterday - apparently a big bloc of the Army are considering boycotting the series as a result. It's a really typical overreaction on the part of the police - surely what everybody wants cleaned up is the violent incidents and the racism. No need to go OTT like that at all, it's just plain stupid.
This is a fine tail, particularly given that none of them are picked on any extra talent with the bat. They can all play, even McGrath these days at 11. And both these guys (particularly Lee) can play good orthodox shots.chalky said:Tail end batting can be the greatest or worst part of watching cricket depending if it is your team batting or bowling.