• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Office of the Stats Keeper

Robertinho

Robertinho

Cricketer Of The Year
Loony BoB said:
Because if I'm right, the highest rating over the season is largely defined by who performs on the first day. It'd be sort of like saying "when was your average the highest" - if someone hit 100 on the first day, they'd have an average of 100, so their rating would be really high too.
Click to expand...
What?... Rating on ITC, I've found, is a culmination of everything, in particular recent form. Someone might have hit 5 100s in the first 5 games and reached a rating of like 800 or something, but if he hits a bad patch towards the end of the season, then his rating will be very low, whereas others who've been mediocre would have an okay rating.
 
Robertinho

Robertinho

Cricketer Of The Year
What? if it was an average rating, then yes, but it's more of a form thing than anything else. Why should players in form at the end of the season be more advantaged than those who were in form at the start or through the middle?
 
Loony BoB

Loony BoB

International Captain
Then call it being a selection based 20% on end of season form. Which is pretty reasonable when you're selecting a team at the end of the season. It's still far better than taking highest ratings, as far as I'm concerened, given that the highest ratings from last season were largely dictated by how well people did in their first few games. And ratings aren't completely based on form, are they? If they were, I can think of some players that would have much better or much worse ratings at the end of the season than what is shown. Looking at the 'current rating' system it seems far more accurate to me. I mean, look at Sajith - on the "Highest Batting" it places him at #14, despite the fact that, outside of his 118, he scored 74 runs @ 8.22 per innings... not exactly deserving of #14 rated batsman for the season in my opinion. He rates #49 in the current batting, a far more accurate showing of how he was thoughout the season. I can't find many faults in the current batting when it comes to putting the classier batsmen of the season at the top.

Consistent batsmen are rated highly and those who had one-off moments are not. That's how it should be. I'm quite certain that the ratings are sort of averaged out for the current rating anyway, much like current average is the average for the entire season and current strike rate is the strike rate for the season and average economy rate is... well, you get the idea.
 
Last edited:
chaminda_00

chaminda_00

Hall of Fame Member
Samuel_Vimes said:
Code: 
Team     P  W  L  D Ba Bo Pts
Black   16 11  4  1 37 45 240
Blue    16  8  8  0 28 48 188
Red     16  8  8  0 24 47 183
Colts   16  7  8  1 19 48 169
Green   16  5 11  0 19 42 131
Click to expand...
You missed this Liam?
 
Magrat Garlick

Magrat Garlick

Rather Mad Witch
Dan, is there any chance of uploading the OD statistics for season 10 as well? I'm getting a bit fed up with sifting through the thread :)
 
ash chaulk

ash chaulk

International Captain
ive been taking alot of stumpings lately i guess thats what happens when you have some of the best spinners in the world at your club
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top