Yeah I'm praying to multiple deities he doesn't emerge as Sam Curran the test player. I like Curran and have been complimentary to his new ball bowling on tour here, but he needs a yard of pace to really crack it and I'm not sure the endless county grind will help him.I totally missed this, but fantastic to see Nathan Smith picked up a county gig, though I'm also a little worried that the county workload will end up breaking hum.
Worcestershire bring in Nathan Smith as all-format overseas player | The Cricketer
Worcestershire have signed uncapped New Zealander Nathan Smith for the entirety of the 2024 season | The Cricketerwww.thecricketer.com
Funnily enough read this earlier today:Smith now with 61 at 19 since moving to Wellington, compared to 51 at 36.7 during his time at Otago. If Duffy ever wants to play for NZ he needs pack his bags and get himself a gig in Christchurch or Wellington.
So no.The Southland Tribune said:Along the way in Duffy’s journey to becoming Otago’s all-time leading wicket-taker, he’s had to watch many of his teammates depart for other associations.
Otago has had some struggles on the field prompting some players to look elsewhere.
Duffy himself has never given a move a lot of thought though. He can only wonder where the association might be if others decided to stay.
“It’s the biggest bugbear of mine. It’s frustrating, the dudes think for whatever reason they have to leave.
“We’ve lost the likes of Nick Kelly, Mike Bracewell, Nathan Smith, Michael Rae, [Michael] Rippon - if you still have those guys in your team you are fighting for titles.
“They do that, but I guess my base is here. My family and Natasha and her family. I’ve never seen any potential gain in me leaving.
“People go for opportunities, but I’ve always had the opportunities, and I’ve always had good coaching here.
“Honestly, I can’t see myself living anywhere else as well. I hate Christchurch, and I don’t like big cities like Wellington and Auckland, and Napier and Tauranga are too far away, so why would I?
“I love the South too much.”
Sure if they can make the tough decisions when it’s time, 90 percent of coaches can’t do that though.I reckon 6 years is the perfect tenure, but lower level coaches are gonna bounce around more.
That's why I reckon 6 years. Long enough to build long term good things, short enough to keep them from stagnating or becoming mates with the players.Sure if they can make the tough decisions when it’s time, 90 percent of coaches can’t do that though.
Stead actually was the right guy at the right time. He was the right guy for the 2 or 3 year steady as she goes, keep it in the background, team can run it self - phase. (although even that phase almost went of the rails with Aus tour of 2019/20)That's why I reckon 6 years. Long enough to build long term good things, short enough to keep them from stagnating or becoming mates with the players.
I know Stead did the latter, but that's because he wasn't the right guy in the first place. A bad coach is a bad coach.