I wouldnt have a problem if Abbas and foulkes both concentrated on their primary discipline both looks promising enough to be decent crickets in their respective rolesAlso interesting that in a mammoth first innings, Abbas only bowled a couple of overs for Wellington. I suppose there is always a question with players like Abbas and Foulkes as to concentrate on one primary discipline over the other - but if he can't get a bowl in a pretty weak Wellington attack... Tashkoff didn't get much of a turn either - 18 overs compared to Younghusband's 42 overs.
Ultimately useless though because draws don't matter.Heh, McPeake 44*(145) as nightwatchman trying to save the match for Wellington.
FFS. Don't talk about these things mate. Just. I mean, really?!? You are the Lord of the Mockers.Heh, McPeake 44*(145) as nightwatchman trying to save the match for Wellington.
Hah, I was following that game on cricinfo and got so nervous when van Beek was thrown the ball foe the final over.I was very careful not to say anything positive about van Beek. That final over of the super smash really taught me that lesson
Unlike the cellar dweller battle last week where it was pointless for Auckland or Otago to go for a draw. In this instance 2nd place is denying 3rd place a shitload of points.Ultimately useless though because draws don't matter.
For Wellington, ND would've leapfrogged them even with a draw. Denying CD a win was the difference between 2nd & 3rd.Unlike the cellar dweller battle last week where it was pointless for Auckland or Otago to go for a draw. In this instance 2nd place is denying 3rd place a ****load of points.
Oh. Is the season over?Nathan Smith won domestic player of the year at the NZ cricket awards.