Bahnz
Hall of Fame Member
Bah, obviously a zoning issue. Here's the youtube clip.Not loading for me, but thanks..
YouTube - Neil Wagner's record-breaking over (5 wickets in 1 over) 2011
Bah, obviously a zoning issue. Here's the youtube clip.Not loading for me, but thanks..
He has a mean doosra.any video link of that match? I m eager to see his bowling action and the way he turns the ball.
And if he is really good he'll have to get his name changed to Wafgner.If this guy is any good, the phrase WAGner is going to be damn common.
Sensational.Bah, obviously a zoning issue. Here's the youtube clip.
YouTube - Neil Wagner's record-breaking over (5 wickets in 1 over) 2011
Mason is a good bowler who was robbed. Got one test when crap like Ian Butler got picked ahead of him.Doesn't suggest incredible pace, but there was some definite significant swing there.
Only thing is I'm worried about is that even Mason swings the ball both ways at domestic level. We all know how well he's done in the step up...
Flem in CD player robbed of intl career shocker.Mason is a good bowler who was robbed. Got one test when crap like Ian Butler got picked ahead of him.
Because of the way he bowls, Mason will always be a risk of getting some tap in ODIs imo.
You've got to admit, Mason is better than Butler.Flem in CD player robbed of intl career shocker.
Only if you admit that Martin is better than Mason.You've got to admit, Mason is better than Butler.
Never.Only if you admit that Martin is better than Mason.
Yay 3000!
Then my good sir, I'm afraid we have reached an impasse.Never.
ODIs: Butler>MasonYou've got to admit, Mason is better than Butler.
Their Test stats suggest the opposite.Test: Mason>>Butler
haha more a predictive guess if they were to have long test careers.Their Test stats suggest the opposite.
Can't understand either. After all, outside broadcasts are as cheap as chips....*** the other day wangner took 5 wickets in one over, the covage was caught on a mobile phone camera so quailty was terrible. I have written many times to NZ TV asking them to have a show dedicated to nz domestic cricket. They all run down there to interview the guy, if only one channel had dedicated time to this comp. the crowds would have been there instead of 3 people...
but they just continue to fight over rugby... while domestic cricket dies a slow death.
This isn't a fantasy world we live in...the cost involved in providing coverage of domestic cricket would be a massive outlay for bugger all. No one turns up to watch it, why would they punt on televising it? And how does it work that crowds would be there if it was on TV?*** the other day wangner took 5 wickets in one over, the covage was caught on a mobile phone camera so quailty was terrible. I have written many times to NZ TV asking them to have a show dedicated to nz domestic cricket. They all run down there to interview the guy, if only one channel had dedicated time to this comp. the crowds would have been there instead of 3 people...
but they just continue to fight over rugby... while domestic cricket dies a slow death.
This is only a loosely connected comment - but 30 years ago when I was 8 years old I went along to a packed seddon park to watch ND vs a touring England team. And then later in the year to see Auckland vs ND in a one dayer also packed.Domestic cricket dies a death because people simply have better things to do with their time than they did 10-20 years ago.