Nathan Hauritz's role in the Australian test side: Should he really be a fixture?

[Flem274*]

Past conditions mean little. Play the pitch under your nose.

 

[Dasa]

Am I the only one who doesn't know what SMH means?

 

[GIMH]

I didn't until a few weeks ago...shake my head...apparently

 

[Prince EWS]

Am I the only one who doesn't know what SMH means?

I always read it as Sydney Morning Herald, but I know that's not what he means.

 

[Dasa]

Thanks GIMH.

I always read it as Sydney Morning Herald, but I know that's not what he means.

Haha yeah, that's what I read it as too.

 

[Furball]

Well done aussie, you've successfully predicted that a spinner bowling at Indian batsmen in home conditions wouldn't be a stunning success.

Problem with your all quick attack is that if you try to unleash an all seam attack in Indian conditions, you'll knacker them by the time the first day is done.

 

[aussie]

Well done aussie, you've successfully predicted that a spinner bowling at Indian batsmen in home conditions wouldn't be a stunning success.

He doesn't have to be a "stunning success". He has to simply able to be fairy effective & when he gets the pitch begins wear & offer turn. As i said before average spinners who Hauritz is a level below such Giles, Krejza, Greg Matthews, Paul Adams, Nicky Boje, Kaneria, P Harris have gone to IND, PAK or SRI in the past in similar Mohali like pitches have have taken 5 wicket-hauls/bowle their team to victory.

Problem with your all quick attack is that if you try to unleash an all seam attack in Indian conditions, you'll knacker them by the time the first day is done.

What?. You are seriously telling me with the fitness leveles of international cricketers, that a 4/5-man pace attack be knackered by day 1 of test match?. Haha..