Perm
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
For real? As a pure batsman he is nothing but a slogger.cheers. I think Dwayne Smith might come good soon....if he can stop throwing his wicket away
For real? As a pure batsman he is nothing but a slogger.cheers. I think Dwayne Smith might come good soon....if he can stop throwing his wicket away
Nah, I think he's got more in him than that if he can control himself a bitFor real? As a pure batsman he is nothing but a slogger.
I would rate all three ahead of Nash personally. Joseph seems to score a fair few runs at domestic level and at A level. But can't seem to take his game to another level when his played Internationals. Considering can covert runs from Grade level to FC level, i can't see how his any better.Sylvester Joseph, Xavier Marshall, Dwayne Smith (when selected in the test team as a specialist batsman) - the usual dire suspects. I'd still rate someone like Wavell Hinds ahead of him though.
So could about half the people who've ever picked-up a cricket bat.cheers. I think Dwayne Smith might come good soon....if he can stop throwing his wicket away
I think Nash holds the record in Australian domestic cricket in taking the longest to get off the mark. Think he took 89 balls or something against Tasmania to get his first run, and I think Maher got his hundred before Nash had made double figures. Bit cloudy on the exact details, but something similar to that.
I'm not writing him off yetSo could about half the people who've ever picked-up a cricket bat.
There's such thing as a "hopeless case" - those who simply don't possess the talent to stop throwing their wicket away.
Smith is very possibly one of.
For "a bit", read "A LOT".Nah, I think he's got more in him than that if he can control himself a bit
grantedFor "a bit", read "A LOT".
Dinath (sp) Ramnarine was white in the original ICC.Who was the last white bloke to play for the West Indies?
Can't really throw Marshall in with the likes of Joseph TBH. Poor structure of WI cricket accounts for his failure so far and a bit due to his attitude. Still young though. He's only like 20 or 21.Sylvester Joseph, Xavier Marshall, Dwayne Smith (when selected in the test team as a specialist batsman) - the usual dire suspects. I'd still rate someone like Wavell Hinds ahead of him though.
Bit unfair on Samuels there. Was one of the few West Indians to do anything decent in his only tour and gets dropped for a reason he hasn't been told. Was hardly going to get another chance no matter how well he did at FC.I would rate all three ahead of Nash personally. Joseph seems to score a fair few runs at domestic level and at A level. But can't seem to take his game to another level when his played Internationals. Considering can covert runs from Grade level to FC level, i can't see how his any better.
Marshall and Smith seem to have potential if they get it right. Marshall was brought in the side way too early and his got some technical issues he needs to fix before he gets brough back. But i still thing his a lot better batsmen then Nash.
Smith, like Fiery said, has got a lot more to offer as batsmen then what his shown in the past. If he stops throwing his wicket away he could be half decent.
Players Nash is better then the Adrain(sp) Giffiths and Robert Samuels of the World. A lot of guys the West Indies have brought in recently haven't been that bad, most just get brought in too early. Just look at the back end of Ganga's career.
Yep, very good point. I read somewhere that Nash had played cricket for a ridiculous amount of weekends in a row before he had some strange injury - he travels the globe to ensure he gets a game every week apparently.It'll be interesting how Nash goes, because he's always struck me as one of the types who has worked his backside off to get as far as he has, which "stereotypically" isn't what you expect of the current Windies side.