honestbharani
Whatever it takes!!!
No, because he was still IN THE ACT of playing a stroke. It is obvious here that Murali WAS NOT still in the act of taking a run. And no, I don't whinge every time a batsman fails to walk after nicking it and the catch is taken just like I didn't exactly whinge when NZ did what they did. The point is, with a caught behind, you can always argue that the umpire is there to do a job and did it. Here, it was not the case.KaZoH0lic said:It depends what fanciful way you wish to describe 'sporting'. There were SIMPLE rules in place and Murali forgot them and as a result got out. That's all there is to it
Do you still consider a batsmen out if he takes a half-swing, cancels his stroke, but still the ball hits his bat? What, he didn't mean to hit it (just as Murali wasn't intending for a run)?
Sporting is playing inside the rules and winning. If these things should be 'sporting' and are a big problem, then they should be in the rules.
BTW, Kazo, I would love to know what your opinion is of the infamous 'handled the ball' dismissal of Cullinan against the Windies. And that of Rich (Langeveldt).