Johan
Cricketer Of The Year
I can get a pixel calc done.Yeah I’m not good at doing relative heights so couldn’t tell ya. Maybe we should ask AI.
I can get a pixel calc done.Yeah I’m not good at doing relative heights so couldn’t tell ya. Maybe we should ask AI.
Are we still arguing if Andy Flower was a world class keeper?The disrespect to Andy Flower in this sub is too much.
Flower isn't close to being elite.Flower is elite, but Sanga and Gilly are clearly above him in this respect.
i
Wording I should have used is at least a tier ahead, which I stand by.Agreed.
I think the difference between Smith/Lara and Kallis/Sangakkara/Ponting is not as big as some people think it is.
Please explain to me how?As a batsman : Sanga > Flower
As a WK : Gilly > Flower
As a WK batsman : Flower > Gilly > Sanga
I’ve always regarded Gilly and Sanga as roughly equal keepers personally
Basically agree. Guys were actually good keepers, great even. A prerequisite to be rated as a great keeper batsman.think Gilly is a little more proven to great pacers but not much inbetween
None of this has anything to do with what's most important.I would rate Andy Flower higher.
- Kept for longer hours
- Batted at a higher position
- Faced more pressure
- Didn’t have the batting support
- Had a much higher peak
I do think Flower was a tier below Sangakkara and Gilchrist with the gloves. Walcott was way before my time, so haven't seen him keep.None of this has anything to do with what's most important.
His actual ability to keep wicket.
The only things that Gilchrist kept that was quicker than Malinga were Lee and Tait.I mean, you can hardly prove yourself to great pacers if there aren’t any on your team. (no disrespect to Chaminda) I’m sure keeping to Malinga in shorter formats was no easy feat either. How’d he go there?
Exactly. And at some point there has to be a minimum standard for the level of wicketkeeping required for these discussions, and nothing I've read or seen indicates Flower meets that standard.You implied it though, by choosing Flower over Gilchrist. I mean the position itself “wicketkeeper batsman” indicates wicketkeeping is the more important factor. Whereas by picking Flower you imply the opposite.
He was more than useful to Murali, not Prasanna, but pretty good.Sanga wasn't that good with the gloves.
A tier?I do think Flower was a tier below Sangakkara and Gilchrist with the gloves. Walcott was way before my time, so haven't seen him keep.
Prasanna J was a top tier keeper. Only one probably better than in recent times was Healy. Sanga manage to keep him out for few years from the team. Unless his glove work was pretty good, that would have not happened.He was more than useful to Murali, not Prasanna, but pretty good.
I was saying that Flower was more than a tier below Sangakkara, that's all.Prasanna J was a top tier keeper. Only one probably better than in recent times was Healy. Sanga manage to keep him out for few years from the team. Unless his glove work was pretty good, that would have not happened.
Saha and ben foakes quite up therePrasanna J was a top tier keeper. Only one probably better than in recent times was Healy. Sanga manage to keep him out for few years from the team. Unless his glove work was pretty good, that would have not happened.
PJ is a different animal. Once in a generation keeper.Saha and ben foakes quite up there
One of the best pure keepersPJ is a different animal. Once in a generation keeper.
Oh he was quite OK with the bat. Averaged 30.One of the best pure keepers
Which for that level of wicket keeping brilliance is imo more than good enough.Oh he was quite OK with the bat. Averaged 30.