ankitj
Hall of Fame Member
I mean he was not all in-your-face, on-my-own-terms kind of cricketer. Still charismatic for being a towering figure in Pakistan cricket.Which is???
I mean he was not all in-your-face, on-my-own-terms kind of cricketer. Still charismatic for being a towering figure in Pakistan cricket.Which is???
Dhoni is the most uncharismatic cricketer EVER.MS Dhoni
I can write a long post explaining why, but I will pass unless someone vehemently disagrees.
Don't know about charismatic, but Dhoni is supercool.MS Dhoni
I can write a long post explaining why, but I will pass unless someone vehemently disagrees.
Reinvented, yes. Many times.I suppose you would have us believe that you invented the wheel too?
Dhoni satisfies both definitions, specially the second one.Noun: Charisma
- A personal attractiveness or interestingness that enables you to influence others
- (Christianity) an extraordinary power granted by the Holy Spirit
A very interesting way of describing Dhoni.Don't know about charismatic, but Dhoni is supercool.
The thing I like most about Dhoni is that he does what he thinks is required to be successful, and then doesn't worry about the result. He takes decisions based on his own reasonings, he bats the way he thinks is optimum for a win and then he doesn't care a **** if he loses. He is one of those characters who thinks and then takes decisions, not the other way round. He tries his best for every success, he gets the wanted result more often than not, and if he doesn't get that he loses neither his sleep nor his hair over it. Dhoni lives in the present and in the near future, not in the past or in the far future.
This is supercool and intelligent, and very effective. Charisma? I don't care frankly. Amitabh Bachchan has it.
i enjoyed the article though it was a bit overblown....for example, sehwag's batting cannot quite be ascribed to warne, ffs!Warne is obviously number one. Great article posted in OP.
Do you mean Cronje? Because I think it's fair to say he was very charismatic.There is another name I want to mention, but I am not sure if it would be well received. I am new to this forum and don't know how the members respond to some controversial names! In a sense, this player polarised cricketing opinions like no one else, but was hugely inspirational at one point in his career. Bearing in mind the period I am talking about, maybe you've already guessed who the player is!
Yes. In my experience, some cricket fans are extremely sensitive to his name being mentioned. Don't want to ruffle feathers but I was a genuine admirer of the guy at one point of time.Do you mean Cronje? Because I think it's fair to say he was very charismatic.
well, he did have a penchant for leather jackets. disqualifies him immediately in my book!Yes. In my experience, some cricket fans are extremely sensitive to his name being mentioned. Don't want to ruffle feathers but I was a genuine admirer of the guy at one point of time.
Lol! I just like to break the monotony when reading on the screen. Besides, there is a good reason so many font types are provided here!+1
BTW, why do you use this font?
Top shout! Cannot believe I forgot to mention him. Really, one of the greatest crowd-pullers ever.Lance Klusener was always amazing to watch too. He made one dayers even more exciting than what they were back then, if only we had players like him in todays game.
Flintoff for sure.Adam Gilchrist and Freddie Flintoff also deserve a mention in this thread.
Never have been an Afridi lover, tbh. Too crass for my liking, I guess. In that hard-hitter + useful bowler mould, Razzaq was the guy I most admired in that team.Waqar was box office. Great action, and such wonderful swing. He would mesmerise everyone whenever he bowled. Watching him break toes was a bonus.
Also loved watching Donald. He was the first cricketer I ever liked watching.
btw Would Afridi be classed as Charismatic?
Classic! This definition should find a place in the official cricketing lexicon.regarding defining charisma, may i suggest another definition: a player's potential to get the largest number of people to commit tonsorial harakiri.
That part made no sense to me either.i enjoyed the article though it was a bit overblown....for example, sehwag's batting cannot quite be ascribed to warne, ffs!