Goughy
Hall of Fame Member
I said Aussie Quicks. If you are including him as a quicky then Im worried as he is miliary at best,19 career fc wickets at an average of about 40.DanielFullard said:Hussey was great for us last year
I said Aussie Quicks. If you are including him as a quicky then Im worried as he is miliary at best,19 career fc wickets at an average of about 40.DanielFullard said:Hussey was great for us last year
Another good point. And I thought Lewis was okay for you fellas?..DanielFullard said:Hussey was great for us last year
He was. I posted praise for him, with some of his great stats, on about page 8 of this threadchooka_nick said:Another good point. And I thought Lewis was okay for you fellas?..
He said "Mick Lewis is officially the worst ODI bowler ever". The only "official" statistic by which Lewis is the worst ever is figures, so he was basing it on these figures.honestbharani said:you don't get it either. The assumption was based on his whole career, not on the last game alone.
If you were saying something like "everyone is allowed a bad series. Look at Gilchrist, he's had a couple in a row now" then yes, that would be justified.honestbharani said:because Murali has 400 ODI wickets.... So if say a Parthiv Patel gets a tribute thread, can I just walk in and point out the Ashes and say Gilchrist deserves to be made fun of too?
I may be wrong, but the only people I know who have gone to pains to say this are Liam and myself.honestbharani said:And fourthly, I still find it funny that most guys seem to take so much pains to state that Lewis wouldn't enjoy this and that you guys feel for him and yet the same almost never happened with Murali. And let's face it, he has copped it more than any international bowler I have seen in my cricket watching days.....
That's OK.honestbharani said:And thirdly, apologies to Tom Halsey, like I said earlier, I wasn't saying a lot of the Murali stuff to you, per se, but a few others who have all been rather anti-Murali in my time here at CW...
yeah, but then again, PArthiv has had a poor career overall as a keeper. So I would say that argument would be wrong too...Tom Halsey said:If you were saying something like "everyone is allowed a bad series. Look at Gilchrist, he's had a couple in a row now" then yes, that would be justified.
Nothing, aside from age. He's been among the strongest performers for the last two Pura Cup seasons, but he's just considered too old to be selected now. The view was that he would not feature in the 2007 world cup, so he was discarded, like Bevan.honestbharani said:But back on topic, whatever happened to Bichel? I thought he might have been a better option than this guy Lewis.
Given the WC is only a year or so away, that is strange logic.FaaipDeOiad said:Nothing, aside from age. He's been among the strongest performers for the last two Pura Cup seasons, but he's just considered too old to be selected now. The view was that he would not feature in the 2007 world cup, so he was discarded, like Bevan.
Bichel is going to end up playing till he's about 40 and doing well till then too in domestic cricket. I think that the selectors bit the bullet at the right time.honestbharani said:Given the WC is only a year or so away, that is strange logic.
Yes but if he was basing his opinion on Patel solely on one series, then it would be justified.honestbharani said:yeah, but then again, PArthiv has had a poor career overall as a keeper. So I would say that argument would be wrong too...
Never were that good at EnglishTom Halsey said:Yes but if he was basing his opinion on Patel solely on one series, then it would be justified.
That was be my point.
Armadillo said:Never were that good at English
????Tom Halsey said:
Slight mistake there...
Above your post. You didn't make mistake, Shorty did.DanielFullard said:????
Oooopps...sorrysteds said:Above your post. You didn't make mistake, Shorty did.