Yeah this. The former is what makes the "Ronaldo is the more complete player" argument a bit weird for me though. It's literally just that he's stronger and can head the ball better. Ronaldo is immense output and final product, but Messi pretty much dictates the game with his passing and dribbling as well.I prefer Messi. They both score insane amounts of incredible goals, but Messi is much more involved in everything else.
Ronaldo would be a better fit for almost every other team though.
Not necessarily imo. I think this is true in terms of brute strength and roughness, but not in terms of pace and power necessarily. It's no coincidence that some of the greatest players of the modern era have been fantastic athletes in their own right as well as having bags of talent. Ronaldo, Drogba and Henry for example, were/are not only great footballers, but capable of amazing feats of athleticism in their own right, which in no small way contributed to their footballing success.I'd have said pace, power and height seem to get more, not less important as you move down the football ladder. Maybe that's just in the UK but certainly the Championship downwards is much more physical than the Premiership or any top European leagues. I think the refereeing is a bit more sympathetic to little guys at the top level, certainly far moreso than in amateur games.
Might be a weird comparison but Messi reminds me a bit of Bradman in that whenever you really start to look into things in detail you find it truly hard to believe that there could be someone so good. In terms of output, he's miles ahead of everyone else, even Ronaldo.
Have to say this thought has occurred to me before as well. Perhaps not quite as ridiculous as Bradman (it's so hard to quantify with football being a continuous game not made up of discrete events anyway) but I certainly find it very hard to believe that there has ever been anyone as good as Messi. Bradman though is probably a stage further - I think most of us would have difficulty believing there has ever been anyone so good, but that there will ever be anyone as good in the future, as well.Might be a weird comparison but Messi reminds me a bit of Bradman in that whenever you really start to look into things in detail you find it truly hard to believe that there could be someone so good. In terms of output, he's miles ahead of everyone else, even Ronaldo.
Yeah it's definitely important, I just think it's more important at lower levels. It's more likely that the stand-out players are great athletes than similar players to Pirlo or Xavi or Rodriguez. Might be wrong though.Not necessarily imo. I think this is true in terms of brute strength and roughness, but not in terms of pace and power necessarily. It's no coincidence that some of the greatest players of the modern era have been fantastic athletes in their own right as well as having bags of talent. Ronaldo, Drogba and Henry for example, were/are not only great footballers, but capable of amazing feats of athleticism in their own right, which in no small way contributed to their footballing success.
I think it depends how much your style of play is built around/reliant on physical aspects. If you're nothing more than a brute, then yeah, physicality will likely be much more effective in the lower levels than the higher levels. But if you're supremely talented and really great physically I don't think the latter will necessarily become less important at higher levels.Yeah it's definitely important, I just think it's more important at lower levels. It's more likely that the stand-out players are great athletes than similar players to Pirlo or Xavi or Rodriguez. Might be wrong though.
Haha, what?Maybe I've got this completely wrong, but I think of Felaini someone not particularly skilful in terms of touch (relatively speaking, of course) but able to have a massive impact at the top level because of his...speed.