Andre
International Regular
Erm, it's further up the page, genius.Craig said:Do you have a link to this article or not?
Erm, it's further up the page, genius.Craig said:Do you have a link to this article or not?
He was picked because he bowled a good spell at Lara in a single net-session.Spetsnatz said:Wasn't Fidel Edwards picked from obscurity ?
is there really much of a point playing macgill and warne?Craig said:Read here
If MacGill is left out, that is it I doubt he would have much of a Test career left (if he does have one).
It will be the interesting who the 4th bowler will be in Tests, as Warne, Gillespie, and McGrath are certainties (barring injury) for the first Test.
Three quicks and one spinner, or two quicks and two spinners?
You favour three quicks and one spinner?tooextracool said:is there really much of a point playing macgill and warne?
Andre said:I know Krejza has got big raps on the Sydney grade scene - plus he's a more than decent bat - but any selection would be very difficult to logically justify other than going on a hunch.
Was there an Australian spinner named Craig White? I remember that name, although because of the original, more illustrious Craig White.Oops yeah sorry, Cameron White. I think I was also thinking of Craig (who started this thread) and his post.
yes if the other spinner happens to be macgill, who practises the same art(leg spin) as warne but bowls it far worse than him. given that indian batsmen have never really had problems against any spinner in the world why exactly would you need another mediocre spinner in the first place?Craig said:You favour three quicks and one spinner?
Meaning 2 seamers and no part timers amongst the batsmen?lord_of_darkness said:in india..probably could do with it.. depending on macgills form, and the location of the match..
I think the spinner you're thinking of was named Barry White.....Arjun said:Was there an Australian spinner named Craig White? I remember that name, although because of the original, more illustrious Craig White.
Barring injury, McGrath and Gillespie will play in the first Test, so it would be down to Lee or Kasprowicz.tooextracool said:yes if the other spinner happens to be macgill, who practises the same art(leg spin) as warne but bowls it far worse than him. given that indian batsmen have never really had problems against any spinner in the world why exactly would you need another mediocre spinner in the first place?
and who out of mcgrath,kasparowicz and gillespie would you drop?
Wouldn't Symonds count as an all-rounder then a part-timer since he bowls in most (if not all) matches he plays in?marc71178 said:Meaning 2 seamers and no part timers amongst the batsmen?
Surely better to have Warne backed by up to 3 part timers (Lehmann, Katich and possibly Symonds)
No, to be fair, when Craig White made his first-class debut for Victoria he was an off-spinner.Son Of Coco said:I think the spinner you're thinking of was named Barry White.....
really? you would actually be in a dilemma deciding between lee and kaspa? i'd pick kaspa over macgill and lee in any conditions.Craig said:Barring injury, McGrath and Gillespie will play in the first Test, so it would be down to Lee or Kasprowicz.
MacGill got left out, pulling out of Zimbabwe at this stage looks like he might as well as well have announced his retirement from international cricket at the same time.tooextracool said:really? you would actually be in a dilemma deciding between lee and kaspa? i'd pick kaspa over macgill and lee in any conditions.