Richard said:Lehmann has been a better player throughout his career than Martyn has been, and is still slightly better even now both have just about reached their peaks of development.
err no, martyn is a better player in his sleep than lehmann. in fact martyn is a better player right now than anyone in the aussie side other than steve waugh at any point in the last 15 years.Richard said:The only better players than him between 1998 and 2004 were Ponting and Stephen Waugh.
Martyn is a much better test player than Lehmann, but surely not quite as good Pontingtooextracool said:err no, martyn is a better player in his sleep than lehmann. in fact martyn is a better player right now than anyone in the aussie side other than steve waugh at any point in the last 15 years.
He's not far off, and he's certainly more devastating on his day, but he's a different sort of batsman to Ponting and leaving his keeping ability aside I think Ponting is much easier to centre a team around in terms of batting.LongHopCassidy said:Surely Gilchrist deserves to be in the Ponting class. Honestly. 15 centuries in six years.
whats ponting's average in india? 2 ?3?zinzan12 said:Martyn is a much better test player than Lehmann, but surely not quite as good Ponting
they're both as good as each other with their weakness against spin. neither of them are near as good as martyn though.LongHopCassidy said:Surely Gilchrist deserves to be in the Ponting class. Honestly. 15 centuries in six years.
That’s why he said up to 2004. Martyn last Australia summer almost got dropped IIRC.tooextracool said:err no, martyn is a better player in his sleep than lehmann. in fact martyn is a better player right now than anyone in the aussie side other than steve waugh at any point in the last 15 years.
I doubt you’d have said that last year when he was going through a real bad patch, and seemed to have a weakness against everything.tooextracool said:whats ponting's average in india? 2 ?3?
seriously, martyn has no weaknesses against any kind of bowling, i think id much rather have him at the crease anywhere in the world, instead of having someone with an obvious weakness against spin
I’d rate Ponting above Martyn, not sure about Gilchrist though.tooextracool said:they're both as good as each other with their weakness against spin. neither of them are near as good as martyn though.
well considering that he nearly got dropped by the same selectors that nearly dropped mcgrath, i dont see how that matters. and yes he wasnt brilliant before 2004, but its not like that should count against him, he was still averaging over 45 at the start of 2004. and hes been averaging over 40 for every year since his return.Tom Halsey said:That’s why he said up to 2004. Martyn last Australia summer almost got dropped IIRC.
and thats despite the fact that hes been averaging over 40 in every series since and including the last ashes? no perhaps i wouldnt have rated him as high as i do after last year, but really everyone has their peaks, and im pretty sure you wouldnt be rating ponting as highly as you do now after 2001.Tom Halsey said:I doubt you’d have said that last year when he was going through a real bad patch, and seemed to have a weakness against everything.
Me too. Ponting's the best batsman in that teamTom Halsey said:I’d rate Ponting above Martyn, not sure about Gilchrist though.