Ok then but since 2000-2001 he has never looked any good bowling at the death that I have seen.Richard said:Kallis was brilliant in 1998-2000.
Before Lee's time.
Oh Dipak is back in Orc-Land now coaching the Auckland development teamsFRAZ said:Where is Deepak Patel Now a days?
No, he's rather lost it.Eclipse said:Ok then but since 2000-2001 he has never looked any good bowling at the death that I have seen.
Eclipse said:I have never seen Kallis bowl well in the death.
Even Brett Lee has had some fun against Kallis in the last few overs off ODI's.
That was actually off Allan Donald :P :P26 off Lee's bat and 27 from the over, I believe. Equalling some recent Shaun Pollock magic.
lol you really are sad.Richard said:Not half as sad as it is that rubbish sloggers like Lee could hit 26 off 5 balls from an all-time great bowler.
I seem to recall one of those sixes landing on a sunshade and taking a few minutes to retrieve (or maybe it rolled off , I dunno). Either way it was one of the coolest things I've ever seen. The sunshade makes me think it was at the WACA. David?iamdavid said:That was actually off Allan Donald :P :P
In the final prelim match of the 2001/02 VB series , Lehmann got a one from the 1st ball , then Lee went for 6 straight over Donald's head , a little upper cut over third man for 4 , another straight 6 , then Donald bowled a yorker & he clipped it through square leg for4 , then off the last ball he tried a slower ball & it got hit 10 rows back.
Its kinda sad that I remember that off the top of my head :saint:
Richard said:rubbish sloggers like Lee
These are teh Austarlianb bowling figures for teh VB Series:Richard said:I am perfectly aware he has only played 2 games against Bangladesh.
If you wish to view an average difference of over 1 and an econ. difference of 0.05 "pretty much the same" then, well, I can only say I sincerely disagree.
However, not as much as I disagree with the notion that an economy-rate of 4.77-an-over, especially combined with an average of 31.68, is good.
That is very, very poor, death-bowler or not.
A good bowler in one-day cricket simply cannot go for more than 4.5-an-over throughout a career.
Apologism for mediocrity.
Shoaib Akhtar: Avg. 21.74, Econ: 4.5Richard said:
A good bowler in one-day cricket simply cannot go for more than 4.5-an-over throughout a career.
Apologism for mediocrity.
according to richards theories no, they try and take wickets instead of keeping the rusn down which is not as good in richards books....Adamc said:Shoaib Akhtar: Avg. 21.74, Econ: 4.5
Waqar Younis: Avg. 23.84, Econ: 4.7
Are these not good bowlers?
Yes, and both will be very disappointed with their economy-rates.Adamc said:Shoaib Akhtar: Avg. 21.74, Econ: 4.5
Waqar Younis: Avg. 23.84, Econ: 4.7
Are these not good bowlers?
Still clutching at the same old straws, eh?age_master said:hes actually a pretty useful lower order batsman (most of his runs dont actually come from slogs) - which you would know if you had ever seen him bat...
Richard said:Still clutching at the same old straws, eh?
Lee is a poor excuse for a "useful" lower-order batsman - any decent bowler will do for him very quickly.
yes, but good bowlers realise that there are 10 wickets to be taken in an innings and that is more improtant than keeping it tight. lower ERs often flow from taking wickets.Richard said:Good bowlers do realise that ER is important, especially in ODIs. And it seems Shoaib has finally realised that for a long haul.