sledger
Spanish_Vicente
A poor man's Ian Salisbury.Wasn't it Chris Schofield?
A poor man's Ian Salisbury.Wasn't it Chris Schofield?
LOL logic and evidence.Shane Warne would now be the leading wickettaker, no?
So wouldn't have in been in Australia's interests to keep Murali banned, so they could claim the greatest batsman and greatest bowler? And Australia had quite a lot of power in the 1990s ICC.
Not much logic behind a pro-Murali conspiracy, and even less evidence.
Who, in turn, was such a poor man's Tony Pigott that his attempt to bowl straight-up-and-down military mediums resulted in something vaguely resembling leg spin.A poor man's Ian Salisbury.
Exactly the reason why that crap should have been changedOne wonders if he would have ended up holding the record for most wickets had the rules not be changed. One suspects he would not have, tbh.
or if it looks like infracting in the subjective view point.We need to change the infraction rules so there's a 15 degree margin of appreciation imo.
It was blantant obvious that it's going to happen. The way themmatter was discussed by commentators and the way press has behaved it was obvious. And interestingly, he is the best bowler for SL in ODI team.I have no problem with players with suspect actions being called to have tests. The problem I have is the reaction of people who claim it is a conspiracy to upset a team/player. If that continues umpires will be too scared to call anyone. If he passes the tests then so be it. I have watched him carefully and it is borderline at minimum, no sour grapes, no running scared. Just saying it as I see it.
So you're now accusing the umpires of bias then seeing as they're the ones who reported him, nobody else did.It was blantant obvious that it's going to happen. The way themmatter was discussed by commentators and the way press has behaved it was obvious. And interestingly, he is the best bowler for SL in ODI team.
What a crock of ****e. Wah wah wah, everyones against us. Waaaahh.It was blantant obvious that it's going to happen. The way themmatter was discussed by commentators and the way press has behaved it was obvious. And interestingly, he is the best bowler for SL in ODI team.
You can call him on breaking the rules all you like but best case scenario is his actions will be reviewed in lab conditions and he'll be back in a few months.Time has come to ban Sledger from Cricket Chat.
You have got your arse handed back to you very recently on mankading? Don't you? It was sick to see what English commentators were doing. FFS this guy has been tested yearly in last three years, and all the time came up with flying colors.What a crock of ****e. Wah wah wah, everyones against us. Waaaahh.
All the bowlers. The extension does not depend on how clean the action looks. McGrath and Pollock extended more than murali's off break.What's happening with those arm monitors that would test live action of suspect bowlers. They should get those out asap so this mess is resolved.
I don't understand the bolded as it doesn't make any sense. It was sick to see? Querying a bloke with a bent arm for being a chucker? Tested by the SL board. Yeah lets see what the real testers have to say about it. Your victim complex is embarrassing. You think Sri Lanka mean enough for there to be a conspiracy about a decent limited overs bowler?You have got your arse handed back to you very recently on mankading? Don't you? It was sick to see what English commentators were doing. FFS this guy has been tested yearly in last three years, and all the time came up with flying colors.
he was tested at UWA i believe. i am only a part time cricket fan and even i know this.I don't understand the bolded as it doesn't make any sense. It was sick to see? Querying a bloke with a bent arm for being a chucker? Tested by the SL board. Yeah lets see what the real testers have to say about it. Your victim complex is embarrassing. You think Sri Lanka mean enough for there to be a conspiracy about a decent limited overs bowler?
Sri Lanka in England 2014 : Sachithra Senanayake's action reported | Cricket News | England v India | ESPN CricinfoSuspicions had previously been raised about the legality of his action during a 2011 tour of England, with the Sri Lanka A team. Senanayake had then worked to remedy his action with Sri Lankan coaches, after which he underwent biomechanical testing in Perth. Those tests found his bowling to be within the legal limits.
mmmmmkkaay.Sri Lanka in England 2014 : Sachithra Senanayake's action reported | Cricket News | England v India | ESPN Cricinfo
Him changing his action, then being tested is not the same as them testing his current action. Sorry, there is no comparison there.