subshakerz
Hall of Fame Member
AB could have pushed his average up to 54/55 if he didn't bail out on tests in his prime and selfishly end his career prematurely just before a WC.
I don't think so. He is known to be a dasher in limited overs formats but his SR in tests was a sedate 54. Agree with the argument on batting positions.ABD role was different from that of Kallis. Kallis usually came a No 3 or 4 and ABD at No 5 or 6. Kallis has to do a supporting role on the other hand ABD has to play generally a quick innings with tailenders to increase the lead before the Team gets All out. ABD is like Steve Waugh a good No 5 player. Kallis and Lara are the right comparison as both usually played at No4 with occasionally coming up at No3.
Calling quits on career is always a self centric move isn't it ?AB could have pushed his average up to 54/55 if he didn't bail out on tests in his prime and selfishly end his career prematurely just before a WC.
Every player should play until they’re dropped. Bradman probably would’ve played another 15 years.Calling quits on career is always a self centric move isn't it ?
ABD already played 114 Tests you can't expect more. He had enough longevity.AB could have pushed his average up to 54/55 if he didn't bail out on tests in his prime and selfishly end his career prematurely just before a WC.
it depends on the match situation, Kallis position is more stable than ABD's No5 and No6 sometimes you have to score fast and sometimes slow based on the match circumstance. If early wickets have fallen then he has to play very slow and if the top order batsmen made good amount of runs then de Villiers has to play faster.I don't think so. He is known to be a dasher in limited overs formats but his SR in tests was a sedate 54. Agree with the argument on batting positions.
By modern standards thats not that high. 130-140 was within his grasp.ABD already played 114 Tests you can't expect more. He had enough longevity.
Modern players have to play in all 3 formats of the game so it’s a bit too much for them. As you said 130-140 could have been better but still 114 is a decent figure as he also had a good ODI career and T20 Career.By modern standards thats not that high. 130-140 was within his grasp.
Maybe, at least in the Dravid-Sanga class.I agree that if ABD played 20 to 30 Tests more and scored more than 10,000 Runs with 50+ Avg he would have been in the Top Tier of Players with the likes of Tendulkar, Lara, Ponting.
Stephen Rodger WaughMaybe, at least in the Dravid-Sanga class.
5th Position | 1985-2004 | 102 | 142 | 22 | 6754 | 200 | 56.28 | 13822 | 48.86 | 24 | 29 | 11 | 733 | 17 |
6th Position | 1985-2003 | 65 | 79 | 17 | 3165 | 177* | 51.04 | 6447 | 49.09 | 6 | 16 | 7 | 350 | 2 |
5th Position | 2006-2018 | 54 | 74 | 11 | 3913 | 278* | 62.11 | 6957 | 56.24 | 14 | 15 | 3 | 427 | 44 |
6th Position | 2005-2013 | 40 | 50 | 4 | 2394 | 217* | 52.04 | 4394 | 54.48 | 5 | 14 | 1 | 276 | 7 |
5th Position | 1996-2015 | 97 | 151 | 29 | 6883 | 203* | 56.41 | 15536 | 44.30 | 19 | 35 | 10 | 714 | 24 |
6th Position | 1994-2014 | 38 | 49 | 10 | 2528 | 147* | 64.82 | 5741 | 44.03 | 7 | 16 | 1 | 310 | 5 |
Dravid and Sanga are No 3 Players. So its better to compare ABD to Waugh and Chanderpaul. However, he is still an under achiever.Maybe, at least in the Dravid-Sanga class.
Semi serious point on this. They did have the unique opportunity of every couple of years, and every 4 years at home, getting a guaranteed 5 or even 6 Tests to feast on the rubbish England bowlers of their time. Batsmen from no other country got this luxury.The undermining of Border and Waugh on CW is quite criminal.
Cricket is a Game Started as a Rivalry between Australia ?? and England ??????? but they also play with other Countries. The Problem with Pakistan is they have very good talent but with poor infrastructure. We only judge cricket players based on what they accomplished and don’t bring the outside factors as they are not relevant in the discussion. Border and Waugh both achieved a lot and you cannot underestimate them. Australia ?? produced very good players due to their Superior Sports facilities in the Country.Semi serious point on this. They did have the unique opportunity of every couple of years, and every 4 years at home, getting a guaranteed 5 or even 6 Tests to feast on the rubbish England bowlers of their time. Batsmen from no other country got this luxury.
okCricket is a Game Started as a Rivalry between Australia ?? and England ??????? but they also play with other Countries. The Problem with Pakistan is they have very good talent but with poor infrastructure. We only judge cricket players based on what they accomplished and don’t bring the outside factors as they are not relevant in the discussion. Border and Waugh both achieved a lot and you cannot underestimate them. Australia ?? produced very good players due to their Superior Sports facilities in the Country.
A Very Good Example : Field Hockey was dominated by India and Pakistan for many years untill 1980s. Once Grass was replaced by Astroturf Courts in Hockey. European and Australian Teams started winning Big Tournaments. Reason is Many India and Pakistan players were not rich enough to pay money and practice on Astroturf courts in their countries as they were only few courts available which can only be afforded by Rich, So the quality of players decreased. In Developed Countries like Australia, England, Germany many players can have easy access to these facilities and can become good sportsman.