I'm not sure what their plans are for the next version but I'd love for the contracts for the Australian domestic games to be done the same way as the English domestic games. Agreed that its a bit restrictive on this version with your squad selections.I love the fact they introduced the Australian domestic scene, but it is seriously frustrating. You can't choose your Twenty20 players, the squads are absurdly small and ****ing Suresh Raina who has wasted a spot as a T20 player all year has gone on international duty after one game. ****ing hell.
They wanted it to mirror the current Australian system as closely as possibleYeah I just don't understand why they didn't do it the same as the English system.
Haha, that's actually really realistic. Crap one day player and good FC player gets picked in one day cricket and looks absolutely gash, gets dropped from both forms despite doing okay in two Tests. Continues to plunder runs in First Class cricket but it's not televised so there's no big push while he continues to look average in one day games and never gets a recall.Have to wonder if this guy did something to deeply offend one of the selectors.
Best FC average in the world in my game, and he hasn't been in the England squad for two years. They're persisting with the rather aged Vaughan, Trescothick and Key instead. Bizarre stuff.
I can see your frustration, and theres certainly been matches where I've hoped to make 250+ after a good start in ODIs only to reach around 200. I'm not sure what side you're playing with, but I find in ICC in internationals against good bowling attacks (particularly subcontinent spinners) increasing the tempo, especially for new batsmen, isn't that easy. I think the balance is about right - I guess you can't expect to belt 150 off the final 20 overs of an ODI every time, and when it does come off everything seems to fall into place.The aggression settings in this game are a ****ing joke. ODI matches, often have batsmen settled in batting on 5 bars (aggressive) but are striking at a rate of 60-70, so up the aggression bar 1 notch and suddenly they start playing and missing then get out. ****ing sick of getting to the 30 over mark being 2-120 or so then trying to score quickly and pretty much always lose the following batsmen quickly and we finish up all out 180-200. If I try and bat aggressively in the earlier overs I often lose wickets quickly and be 5-60 at after ten.
Same goes for Tests sometimes too. Will start batsmen out on v.defensive but once they're settled and I try putting them on 2 or 3 bars and they get out almost straight away. Deadset ****ing bull****.
Playing 2010 edition with New Zealand (on normal). In the past I've experienced this problem but it was balanced out with better ODI performances, getting 300+ once every 3 games or so. With this game it's been every innings at least 4 batsmen will get out within 2 overs of upping it.I can see your frustration, and theres certainly been matches where I've hoped to make 250+ after a good start in ODIs only to reach around 200. I'm not sure what side you're playing with, but I find in ICC in internationals against good bowling attacks (particularly subcontinent spinners) increasing the tempo, especially for new batsmen, isn't that easy. I think the balance is about right - I guess you can't expect to belt 150 off the final 20 overs of an ODI every time, and when it does come off everything seems to fall into place.
Haha, that's actually really realistic. Crap one day player and good FC player gets picked in one day cricket and looks absolutely gash, gets dropped from both forms despite doing okay in two Tests. Continues to plunder runs in First Class cricket but it's not televised so there's no big push while he continues to look average in one day games and never gets a recall.