ajaagarkarajaaja
Banned
No problem with that, BUT he's also commenting on people who disagree with his views, thats what unacceptable
-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
Indian "Pace" Bowlers ? The Ones With Chance , The Ones that Deserve Chance?
- Thread starter lord_of_darkness
- Start date
- Status
ajaagarkarajaaja
Banned
Thats senseless humour!
ajaagarkarajaaja
Banned
I'm complaining about your remarks thats were directed against me, i've no problem whether you call Ajit great or crap, just don't get personal
CricketGuru
School Boy/Girl Captain
Come on guys lets just finish these personal attacks right here and why do we need to get personal over Ajit anyways is he worth it 
ajaagarkarajaaja
Banned
LOL joking about previous disputes?? then why did you had to mention me in it??
ajaagarkarajaaja
Banned
You should better fear the Aussies who are going to really give your side a thrashing.I can understand your anxiety though, must be really tuff time for the English people when their side is getting pasted in every second match!
Rik
Cricketer Of The Year
No I just think back about how many other teams have experianced the same, and the 2nd best team in the world, South Africa, suffered a 5-1 loss in the double header against Australia...if the 2nd best team in the world suffer that, and with similer injury problems, then I can take heart from England's performances.
ajaagarkarajaaja
Banned
LOL getting out on 76, yet taking it well!!
surely English men have set a very low standard
surely English men have set a very low standard
Rik
Cricketer Of The Year
Just think about Pakistan and then you won't think 76 is actually that bad. Anyway just look at your bowler's ODI returns and you'll see India are setting standards in ODI bowling. And I'm also waiting to see how you take it when India are whitewashed by Australia...Originally posted by ajaagarkarajaaja
LOL getting out on 76, yet taking it well!!
surely English men have set a very low standard
Rik
Cricketer Of The Year
India's bowling attack have been plastered around their own stadiums by the West Indies batsmen and are 2-1 down to a team everyone says is one of the worst ODI teams in the world...so I'm quite surprised your so optimistic and yet can claim other teams like England are setting low standards...:frog:
ajaagarkarajaaja
Banned
: [/quote]
Just think about Pakistan and then you won't think 76 is actually that bad. Anyway just look at your bowler's ODI returns and you'll see India are setting standards in ODI bowling. And I'm also waiting to see how you take it when India are whitewashed by Australia... [/quote]
Thats wasn't a smart remark, i don't want to be rude BUT just because Pakistan fared poorly and got out cheaply doesn't mean that English score of 76 wasn't pathetic!
Secondarily, Pakistan was without Inzi and Youhanna,Afridi . They fielded a team that was too young, almost a school team.Also, if they fared poorly in the second test, the same team gave Aus a scre in the first test, Can england do that???
India might get pasted in Aus but atleast we defeated them in India!! England got pasted on their own back yard .Also, India would atlest won't get out at a score of just 76:frog
Just think about Pakistan and then you won't think 76 is actually that bad. Anyway just look at your bowler's ODI returns and you'll see India are setting standards in ODI bowling. And I'm also waiting to see how you take it when India are whitewashed by Australia... [/quote]
Thats wasn't a smart remark, i don't want to be rude BUT just because Pakistan fared poorly and got out cheaply doesn't mean that English score of 76 wasn't pathetic!
Secondarily, Pakistan was without Inzi and Youhanna,Afridi . They fielded a team that was too young, almost a school team.Also, if they fared poorly in the second test, the same team gave Aus a scre in the first test, Can england do that???
India might get pasted in Aus but atleast we defeated them in India!! England got pasted on their own back yard .Also, India would atlest won't get out at a score of just 76:frog
ajaagarkarajaaja
Banned
What i'm surprised at is that at such a young age of 19 years you have such a poor memory!!
England got pasted in the netwest Trophy final and they couldn't even defend a huge score of 325!! In the CT they were again thrashed by India, YET one of their fans is critisizing Indian teams performance??
India is 2-1 down, BUT this is a 7 match series, Also, WI team is certainly better than England, you should have known by now that the worst onedayer team is none other than England(Zimb and Bang not considered):frog:
Rik
Cricketer Of The Year
Just think about Pakistan and then you won't think 76 is actually that bad. Anyway just look at your bowler's ODI returns and you'll see India are setting standards in ODI bowling. And I'm also waiting to see how you take it when India are whitewashed by Australia... [/quote]
Thats wasn't a smart remark, i don't want to be rude BUT just because Pakistan fared poorly and got out cheaply doesn't mean that English score of 76 wasn't pathetic!
Secondarily, Pakistan was without Inzi and Youhanna,Afridi . They fielded a team that was too young, almost a school team.Also, if they fared poorly in the second test, the same team gave Aus a scre in the first test, Can england do that???
India might get pasted in Aus but atleast we defeated them in India!! England got pasted on their own back yard .Also, India would atlest won't get out at a score of just 76:frog [/quote]
England have already given them a score, the scored over 300 which is a decent total especially against a team as strong as Australia...also cricket is a strange game and there is no reason why India could get out for 76 or lower, especially on the pacey Aussie tracks which Continental batsmen struggle on because they are used to Indian slow, low, turners.
ajaagarkarajaaja
Banned
Oh dear, by just scoring 300 runs, you thought it was enough to give Aussies a scare??
Aus dropped a number of catches and that was the main reason as to why England managed such a total, but regardless of that, Aus defeated England by a HUGE margin, it wasn't a close match so there wasn't any case of scare or so
Aus dropped a number of catches and that was the main reason as to why England managed such a total, but regardless of that, Aus defeated England by a HUGE margin, it wasn't a close match so there wasn't any case of scare or so
ajaagarkarajaaja
Banned
[[/quote]
There is a noted similarity with the series between India and WIndies then...you've been thrashed twice and by an inferior team which is lacking Lara... [/quote]
I could have given you a much better reason for India's poor display earlier on but i thought a team should perform even when its missing one or two of its player.
IF WI is without Lara, then India is without Sachin(a much better batter) and also without strike bowler Z Khan!!!!
As for comparision, he's the difference, in the end India will most probably win the series or go down 3-4. On the other hand England will lose to Aus 4-0 or 5-0!
[Edited on 13/11/2002 by ajaagarkarajaaja]
There is a noted similarity with the series between India and WIndies then...you've been thrashed twice and by an inferior team which is lacking Lara... [/quote]
I could have given you a much better reason for India's poor display earlier on but i thought a team should perform even when its missing one or two of its player.
IF WI is without Lara, then India is without Sachin(a much better batter) and also without strike bowler Z Khan!!!!
As for comparision, he's the difference, in the end India will most probably win the series or go down 3-4. On the other hand England will lose to Aus 4-0 or 5-0!
[Edited on 13/11/2002 by ajaagarkarajaaja]
Rik
Cricketer Of The Year
There is a noted similarity with the series between India and WIndies then...you've been thrashed twice and by an inferior team which is lacking Lara... [/quote]
I could have given you a much better reason for India's poor display earlier on but i thought a team should perform even when its missing one or two of its player.
IF WI is without Lara, then India is without Sachin(a much better batter) and also without strike bowler Z Khan!!!!
As for comparision, he's the difference, in the end India will most probably win the series or go down 3-4. On the other hand England will lose to Aus 4-0 or 5-0!
[Edited on 13/11/2002 by ajaagarkarajaaja] [/quote]
Different quality of opposition again...there is no comparision.
- Status