• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Indian domestic season 2006-07

Jungle Jumbo

International Vice-Captain
Yes, Hindu is the best. Indian Express and DNA are the other 2 publications to supplement The Hindu. The Telegraph is useful to follow Bengal and whenever it does follow other domestic matches (usually the important ones), it is quite good as well usually.
I've been using it fairly often this year. Also good for the minority cricket - CK Nayudu Trophy and local league cricket.

Times of India comes across a bit tabloidy for my liking. Plus it overloads my browser with at least five pop ups per page.
 

Pratters

Cricket, Lovely Cricket
I've been using it fairly often this year. Also good for the minority cricket - CK Nayudu Trophy and local league cricket.

Times of India comes across a bit tabloidy for my liking. Plus it overloads my browser with at least five pop ups per page.
Times of India is the last newspaper I would suggest you to read for any thing. Yep, Hindu covers a lot of local cricket (and other local sports for that matter). The Hindu group is very old and respectable and have also been publishing the weekly Sportstar sports mag for the past 30 years or so (www.tssonnet.com) (50% of which is cricket in almost every issue). Before that, for 25 years, they published a weekly magazine called Sport and Past time which is really great read because of the excellent old pieces you can find on it. They also publish the Indian cricket almanack and have been doing it for the past 60 years or so. It is in line with Wisden though not half as good because it does not have detailed match reports more often than not compared to Wisden but whatever. The Hindu photo library has a great collection of photographs including rare sports photographs. Hindu is one of the best media houses in the country and has a rich sports coverage about it as well. The reporting in Hindu is proper as opposed to many of the Indian media and though some times people find it too formal, I quite like it.
 

Arjun

Cricketer Of The Year
Times Of India may have its problems, but with competition from Deccan Chronicle, DNA and HT, they've improved a great deal. Their coverage of domestic cricket is very good, especially for Mumbai. There was an article on the four young 'Mumbhais'– Abhishek Nair, Hiken Shah, Rohit Sharma and Sahil Kukreja– who propelled Mumbai to the semis.
 

Arjun

Cricketer Of The Year
It's a disappointing end to Sridharan Sharath's FC career. He played for 15 years and averaged a little over 50, but always missed out because there was far too much competition at that time. This match against Baroda was his last, and he was out for zero in seven balls, due to a dubious decision by an umpire. He was one who always piled on the runs and battled a career-threatening injury to keep on scoring for a team with a talented but fickle batting order.

Elsewhere, as Haryana are (unforutnately) relegated to Plate, Joginder Sharma, their all-rounder and captain, led the wickets tally throughout the series. He's been performing consistently as the figures suggest, but his coach says there have been improvements in every season. In fact, not only does he swing the ball to good effect, he's also been bowling faster than before. He's very fit and practices very hard. He's been a little out of form with the bat (just like the rest of his team, plagued by batting woes) but he can perform the role of a final-overs batsman well for his team, which is where he fits in best.
 

Arjun

Cricketer Of The Year
There's this article on a forthcoming domestic Twenty20 tournament in April, before the Twenty20 World Championship. The BCCI folks are discussing the venues as well as the schedules. Frankly, playing the tournament in the conventional format will be catastrophic, especially in the tiny club grounds in India. The BCCI sould choose large venues, and have a very slow outfield and a pitch with lots of bounce. In other words, make it a Twenty20 to encourage fast bowlers.

The BCCI promise 'better pitches' for domestic cricket, after yet another defeat abroad. They've been making these promises repeatedly and even keeping them, but how does that help? Merely improving the pitches doesn't help. The bowlers also need to improve. They should use these new pitches better and attack the batting, which we haven't seen this season, as there has been one draw too many in the same round.
 

adharcric

International Coach
Arjun said:
which we haven't seen this season, as there has been one draw too many in the same round.
Perhaps that's a result of flat pitches and the first-innings lead rule?
 

Arjun

Cricketer Of The Year
Only now, I've been getting NEO Sports, and I've seen the replay of the third day's play of the Irani Trophy final. Needlessly dragged on. They could have made a package of the whole day in an hour. I saw Gautam Gambhir race to 64 and stay unbeaten, playing neat shots and running hard between the wickets. Uthappa gave him good support, running hard and pnishing anything pitched full, but got out to a needless pull off a short delivery by Pravin Kumar. All the UP bowlers were bowling in the 120's. Zaidi, their old warhorse, was bowling first-change in the 110's.
 
Last edited:

Arjun

Cricketer Of The Year
NEO is on! NEO is on! NEO is on!

What a pity...none of the semis are being covered on the channel...they're showing the ODI series between India and Pakistan in 2005!
 

adharcric

International Coach
Backing Bengal to destroy Karnataka on the supposed greentop at the Eden Gardens. Bose and co. will be too much for a Dravid-less, Uthappa-less Karnataka side.

The other match should be far more interesting. I have a feeling Pathan will turn it on in this match but Jaffer, Sharma and Muzumdar are very dangerous batsmen.
 
Last edited:

Arjun

Cricketer Of The Year
As of now, the match in Bengal is seemingly one-sided. Bengal seamers Bose and Sarkar blasted through Karnataka routing them for 89, sharing ten wickets in identical fashion as a previous match, with Bose taking six and Sarkar, four. Right now, Bengal are at 97 for 3, with Rohan Gavaskar scoring at a very quick rate, making 60 in 71 so far.

The more important match in Baroda is at an interesting stage. Irfan took the first wicket but no more. Seamer Rakesh Patel snared two tailenders, Samant and Kulkarni, in quick succession. He's been in good form until this match as he bowled one no-ball too many and the Mumbai batsmen, especially Mazumdar (not sure), took to him easily, as also to spinner Rajesh Pawar. The spinner took two wickets. For some reason, leggie Yusuf Pathan bowled six overs and took a wicket, then left midway during the seventh over, leaving Pawar to complete it.
 

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
I really really want Pathan to become at least an OK bowler. He would help so much in our side, as he is decent batsman. He could be the long term solution at #7, and be the 5th bowler.
 

Jungle Jumbo

International Vice-Captain
I really really want Pathan to become at least an OK bowler. He would help so much in our side, as he is decent batsman. He could be the long term solution at #7, and be the 5th bowler.
TBH I still can't see why India can't get ten reasonable overs out of Tendulkar, Yuvraj and Mongia/Sehwag. It seems to be cutting down on batting talent (of which there is undoubtedly plenty) for the sake of a fairly average bowler.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
TBH I still can't see why India can't get ten reasonable overs out of Tendulkar, Yuvraj and Mongia/Sehwag. It seems to be cutting down on batting talent (of which there is undoubtedly plenty) for the sake of a fairly average bowler.
yeah and apparently, according to The Daily Telegraph (they cover domestic cricket in detail, but aren't exactly unbiased though), he was bowling lesser than 120 kph. That will never work out in the international arena. Even Larsen and Harris would bowl slightly quicker than that.
 

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
My team will find a way to let me down, whether its India or my home town team Baroda.

Mumbai leads by 200 with 3 wickets left. If they can knock it over with a lead of less than 250, Baroda has a shot.

CC Williams has to come through though, as the experienced one in the lineup. The Pathan brothers also need to contribute.

With that said, IK Pathan is 3/39 in the second innings, and had 3/49 in the first. I hope Baroda win and he can contribute again in the finals. I think its unlikely, but maybe his form is starting to return now that he is out of the spotlight and away from the international pressure?
 

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
About that 0/5:

Irfan removed the Bombay opener in the first over, and then Patel got W Jaffer in the very next one. Irfan then came back and nailed two more in the second over off successive deliveries. And Patel got his second one in the over right after that. Great partnership between Mota and Samant took them to 83/6. So all in all Bombay still are ahead but Baroda will hopefully pull it out tomorrow.

Great thing is even though I can't watch it, I've really been getting interested in domestic cricket recently...can anyone else watch/listen to it anywhere?
 

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
From cricinfo:

Ten startling minutes of play in Baroda, which had every statistician reaching for the record-books, threatened to turn this match on its head but may end up as just another footnote in this absorbing encounter. By stumps Mumbai had recovered from their disastrous start - a staggering five wickets gone without a run on the board - and now have their noses comfortably in front.

But the talking point, inevitably, was those five wickets that fell to Irfan Pathan and Rakesh Patel between 2-05 and 2-15 p.m. Among the zeroes was one India probable (Rohit Sharma), one India opener (Wasim Jaffer) and a batsman (Amol Muzumdar) who'd just broken a 22-year-old record for the most number of runs scored by a Mumbai batsman in a Ranji Trophy career.

The breakdown, for the record-books:

0.4 overs: Sahil Kukreja holed out at point off a short and wide Pathan delivery. The ball deserved punishment but the shot was gobbled up by Satyajit Parab.

1.6 overs: Wasim Jaffer edged a Patel delivery to 'keeper Shah, who held a smart catch.

2.4 overs: Hiken Shah didn't have a clue whether to play on the front foot or the back to Pathan and his indecision forced him to edge to the slips.

2.5 overs: Rohit Sharma, a double centurion against Gujarat, was a tad unlucky, ruled LBW when shouldering arms to an incoming Pathan delivery.

3.2 overs: Amol Muzumdar, the Mumbai skipper, stayed at the wicket for 10 minutes without scoring but was trapped by Patel plumb in front.

"It was unbelievable", said Vinayak Samant, the veteran Mumbai 'keeper who steadied the ship. "It took a while for us to register what was happening around us."

The carnage, which lasted 17 deliveries, wasn't the worst ever beginning to a first-class match. That record belongs to Surrey v MCC in May 1872, where the MCC's seven wickets for no runs included that of a "Mr W G Grace".

But it did break the Indian domestic record (0-4), previously set by Kerala against Mysore in 1963.

Neither of those two hapless teams had anyone performing a rescue act, but Mumbai had one in Samant, who along with Wilkin Mota, the all-rounder, added 66 runs for the seventh wicket to help Mumbai reach 109-8 at stumps. Samant was batting on 53.

Muzumdar must be thanking his stars that he picked Mota instead of Iqbal Abdullah, the left-arm spinner. He'd already picked up three Baroda wickets as Mumbai skittled out the hosts for 142 before making the most of a dropped chance in the second slip and grafting a precious 33.

Mumbai were doubly fortunate that Samant was in a determined mood today. "I'm a busy kind of a player... I keep working the ball around for ones and twos. Today though, I played in the 'V'. Playing straight minimizes the risk element,'' Samant said.

Later, Muzumdar acknowledged the pair's contributions. "They played exceedingly well. It was an extremely important partnership at that stage. And if we manage to put on a few more on the board tomorrow, I think it will a great contest."
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
Neo Sports would have shown it LIVE but for the clash with the Pepsi Cup. I think we will get the finals LIVE though.
 

Top