Arjun said:
b]Mohinder Amarnath[/b]- His comments on a discussion show on TV show that he has good ideas, but his man-management skills are not known. Tough call, but an unexpected choice.[/list]
I think
Amarnath can actually prove a good selection. He has an unfulfilled career missing a lot do to the selector's incompetency.
He has the hunger I would assume thus.
Also, there is no denying his good cricket mind and being a good player technically, one of the best to players of fast bowling to have played for India
There are a few deterrents though. Apart from a small coaching stint cricinfo mentions, he hasnt had much experience. How would Amarnath fare at using the modern technologies a coach is known to use? Kapil Dev has failed as a coach despite being a great player. Why could Amarnath lead to the same. Wright has shown a foreign coach is away from local pressures from various regions in Indian cricket. Would Amarnath be able to face such a pressure. Recently Amarnath remarked on television that Ganguly should remain in the one dayers but not in tests. Does the man have too drastic ideas?
Amarnath is not a rash or instinctive who doesnt use his mind. He is more like Greg Chappell than Kapil Dev. A top cricketer with a good mind. Ashok Mankad has shown with Mumbai that a coach is not all about using the modern methods though they can be useful.
Amarnath is definitely a good option. As good as Chappell. I have apprehensions about Chappell despite him being the popular choice of the media and Ganguly.
Chappell is excellent. No doubt about it. He has shown coaching excellence and has a great cricketing mind. But he almost became the coach last time. He fell out over money with the Indian board. This time he categorically stated he be willing to do the job if asked by the board and wouldnt go out of his way to apply. There are money related matters and Chappell is apparently demanding too much this time too according to Sportcentre India. Too much for the Indian board's convenience. He is also demanding word in selection, again the Indian board isnt comfortable with it.
It all sends the wrong signals to a relationship with the Indian board which is stringent and could lead to a fall out even if Chappell is indeed appointed coach. Chappell is too proud a man to bow down to any thing. Indian board too haughty. It could make Indian cricket suffer if the two parties concerned fall out at any stage after Chappell is appointed coach.
Patil Will the Indian batting heroes, all excellent batsmen, listen to an average batsman from their own country? They listened to Wright but Wright had a good record as a coach and player. Buchanan is heard by Australian cricketers. But Buchanan had already proved his mettle as an excellent coach domestically. Patil has coached Kenya, India A and has experience. But I doubt if he is really excellent, top notch.
Moody Excellent results in the county circuit and a humble man, he can fall very well into place. Much like John Wright. Wouldnt carry any domestic baggages. He would be my second choice after Amarnath.
I would be happy if Amarnath or Moody got the job, a wee bit concerned if Chappell or Patil gets it.