adharcric
International Coach
Yadav/Kartik: I'm not saying they are the same type of players. India can either go with 5 batsmen, dhoni, 4 bowlers and yadav (supersub in if batting second) ... or 5 batsmen, dhoni, 5 bowlers (supersub in for a bowler no matter what). They tried both of these approaches against SL. For the all-rounder slot though, the options would indeed be Powar, Y Pathan, etc.Arjun said:Yadav.....replaced by Karthik? There's a MASSIVE difference in batting between the two. Not to mention, Yadav's fielding is a little better. If you want to replace Yadav with anyone, choose Bangar or Powar or Yusuf Pathan.
Raina will find it very hard to make the playing XI. Gambhir will (or should) have a better chance, since he's also a frontline Test opener and he combines well with Sehwag, unlike his more illustrious counterparts. Raina, however, will make a very useful substitute fielder or super-sub, and as a reserve, he can't be too bad.
They need to look for a new strike partner for Irfan. Agarkar is an easy target for the hard hitters and his lack of power won't inspire much confidence in anyone– nor will those occasional 20-run overs. VR Singh should be monitored as a future ODI contender, given his pace, and also his build, but he'll have to recover from his injury first.
Raina/Gambhir: Raina will be the 2nd option to break into the playing 11 after gambhir, you're right about that.
Agarkar: I know what you're talking about, but were there any 'occasional 20-run overs' from him in the SL series. As far as I know, he's bowled well so far in the Dravid-Chappell era, so he should be judged on that and nothing else. Also, Pathan has been a pretty big target for batsmen in the slog overs as well, much more so than Agarkar. VRV Singh will be a good option though, guys like him, RP Singh and Sreesanth could be solid. (Munaf Patel, Abid Nabi??)