Cricket Bliss
U19 Debutant
Dujon might be the most entertaining Wicket keeper. His reflexes against fast bowling is amazingMarshall would be entertaining to watch I reckon.
Dujon might be the most entertaining Wicket keeper. His reflexes against fast bowling is amazingMarshall would be entertaining to watch I reckon.
During his peak he had output up there with any ATG bowler plus his level of talent and the overwhelming number of peers who rate Wasim the best means he gets rated quite high.Why is Akram overrated? Outside here Akram is pretty much overrated especially youtube comments rate him as the greatest bowler to breathe! In ODI upto an extent this won’t be an exaggeration but in Tests! Is it because the amount of swing he generated? Akram WPM is barely 4
He really was.Marshall would be entertaining to watch I reckon.
There was sometimes murmurs that he used to dive to overcome his poor footwork, but he was just so genuinely athletic and nimble on his feet.Dujon might be the most entertaining Wicket keeper. His reflexes against fast bowling is amazing
And yet the numbers don’t bear it out.Which is what is different and unique about him.
It's a lot of peer reviews based on how difficult he was to play.
He was before my timeMarshall would be entertaining to watch I reckon.
I don't disagree with you.And yet the numbers don’t bear it out.
For example I’m pretty sure Lara has said he was the most difficult.
7 matches against Wasim and he only was dismissed by him twice.
Compared to 3 in 6 for Waqar, 15 in 24 for McGrath, 6 in 10 for Donald
He truly was something to watch.He was before my time
Can easily be argued he was the 4th best pacer of his own era.The peers that rate Wasim highly only talk about his skills.. skills don't automatically translate into results.
Being difficult to face may not be the same as raw effectiveness. But it deserves credit in itself.And yet the numbers don’t bear it out.
For example I’m pretty sure Lara has said he was the most difficult.
7 matches against Wasim and he only was dismissed by him twice.
Compared to 3 in 6 for Waqar, 15 in 24 for McGrath, 6 in 10 for Donald
“I found him difficult to face but he could almost never get me out” “I found him relatively easier to face but he always got me out”Being difficult to face may not be the same as raw effectiveness. But it deserves credit in itself.
Not bad since the other three are Top 6-7 of all timeCan easily be argued he was the 4th best pacer of his own era.
TrueSkills don't automatically translate into results.
This is pretty much all peer ratings. Pretty much nobody is rating the most effective players, and are effectively answering a different question to us.The peers that rate Wasim highly only talk about his skills.. skills don't automatically translate into results.
Always.“I found him difficult to face but he could almost never get me out” “I found him relatively easier to face but he always got me out”
I prefer option 2
He did?Not bad since the other three are Top 6-7 of all time
True
Like Fed is perhaps the most skilled and most pleasing to watch but ended up as the third best of his era.
Not bad since the other three are Top 6-7 of all time
True
Like Fed is perhaps the most skilled and most pleasing to watch but ended up as the third best of his era.
I rate Fed secondHe did?
I find it hard to classify him in the same era as the other two. Since his peak was before them and he was 5+ years older than both.I rate Fed second
But yeah he is third in the most important thing
I rate Fed second
But yeah he is third in the most important thing