• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Imran Khan vs Shane Warne (as bowlers)

Who was the better Test bowler

  • Imran

  • Warne


Results are only viewable after voting.

BazBall21

International Captain
I wasn't attacking you at all. I know enough of your posting history to know better.

I only jumped in when people started accusing benaud of malicious intent (you) and casual racism (some other poster, was it asshole?) because he refused to include the WI Pacers or Murali in his favorite 11. Which is ludicrous, even by your usual standards.
It wasn't asshole that accused Benaud of casual racism. Think it might have been short-pitched.
 

Adorable Asshole

International Regular
I wasn't attacking you at all. I know enough of your posting history to know better.

I only jumped in when people started accusing benaud of malicious intent (you) and casual racism (some other poster, was it asshole?) because he refused to include the WI Pacers or Murali in his favorite 11. Which is ludicrous, even by your usual standards.
No I didn't.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
But dude, I'm not trying to change anyone's mind, they are trying to change mine for some reason.
Dude, I posted a list.

The funny thing is that the only agenda I have here is to get a greater appreciation and consideration for slip fielding., Which isn't catching on btw
But hey if the batmen so their job, the tail becomes less important. If the bowlers do their job, the cordon becomes more important. But that's for another thread. 😀
I really like your slip fielding agenda. I'd incorporate it myself more if there was a more objective way to judge slippers I didn't see from decades ago than mythology and guesses. I just don't know enough about whether Peter May would be a good third slip option for example.
 

kyear2

International Coach
I wasn't attacking you at all. I know enough of your posting history to know better.

I only jumped in when people started accusing benaud of malicious intent (you) and casual racism (some other poster, was it asshole?) because he refused to include the WI Pacers or Murali in his favorite 11. Which is ludicrous, even by your usual standards.
Yes I did, because it was.

But was when asked about my agenda vs Imran.

I think he's the 6 to 8 best bowler ever, for purpose of this let's say 6th, that's where most of the forum does, if not lower. I think he's a top two bowling all rounder, but just because I, as does almost everyone on the forum does, believe that Hadlee was the better bowler, I'm sure even you have said that already.

I voted for him in this very poll and even posted a couple times for.

Where is the bias, what is the agenda.
 

kyear2

International Coach
I really like your slip fielding agenda. I'd incorporate it myself more if there was a more objective way to judge slippers I didn't see from decades ago than mythology and guesses. I just don't know enough about whether Peter May would be a good third slip option for example.
With Hammond (and Weekes, yes Weekes) for example we can only use anecdotal evidence, but there are videos on you tube where you can see some of his catches. For Simpson, Sobers, Lloyd etc, anecdotal evidence as well, but also you can look for vids of the bowlers of their teams and that's where I see a quite a bit of catches as well as commentary, such as that's yet another magnificent catch by A, that's two now for the innings.

More recent guys like Kallis, Ponting, Smith(ish), DeVilliers, Richardson, we would have seen for the most part and there's much more video evidence in these modern times. Also shows how some guys were less stellar than others, Warne, Lara caught their fair share, but weren't elite and dropped some average ones as well.

It's definitely more difficult that bating and bowling stats, but we don't just use those either....
 

Coronis

International Coach
Hey @Coronis - this is why I get away with the Viv thing more than you do. I have an even sillier one!

After they retire and I start saying more about it I reckon I'll cop it for Smith and Labuschagne too.
Ah so I just have to come up with something crazy that people will buy.

Like Hayden > Tendulkar but an original.
 

Slifer

International Captain
What have the people of CW done to deserve this wall of text. Ikki would have been proud of this post. Except that you seem impervious to reason and just continue to push your agenda. Despite you being given so many arguments regarding all the supposed "issues" you mentioned about Imran you refuse to address the arguments and then continue on parroting your same old tired points that have been addressed. And OS and trundler just pointed out the inconsistency in your reasoning as the biggest problem which you never seem to address. And neither do you seem to address the substantive points of any of other people's arguments. Then you wonder why people are attacking you.
Do us (me) a favor and don't mention him again. Literally, no one is as biased as this dude. He used to argue for Warne being the best bowler ever and used to bring up expert opinion, yet when you did the same with Sobers, he completely disregarded it. He did the same with Lillee vs any other fast bowlers.
 

smash84

The Tiger King
Do us (me) a favor and don't mention him again. Literally, no one is as biased as this dude. He used to argue for Warne being the best bowler ever and used to bring up expert opinion, yet when you did the same with Sobers, he completely disregarded it. He did the same with Lillee vs any other fast bowlers.
No not for Sobers, I argued for Marshall against Warne. I remember that. It was hilarious.

Ikki, added some colour to the forum though. Brought alternative viewpoints and made some interesting points. I think he shouldn't have left.
 

Slifer

International Captain
No not for Sobers, I argued for Marshall against Warne. I remember that. It was hilarious.

Ikki, added some colour to the forum though. Brought alternative viewpoints and made some interesting points. I think he shouldn't have left.
Well no, he isn't the worst poster I've seen that would be Blocky but Ikki was something else.

I remember the times he'd argue that McGrath was better than Marshall because McGrath played on flatter wickets which is a legit argument. But then in the next breath, he'd rank McGrath below Lillee. One would argue Lillee played mostly in 3 countries and in the same general era as Marshall but then he'd bring in expert opinion or say the wickets Lillee bowled on were flat when lillee played. That made absolutely no sense.
 

Top