BazBall21
International Captain
I know your reasons for Hammond. Why Border?Nah. Mine are Border and Hammond.
I know your reasons for Hammond. Why Border?Nah. Mine are Border and Hammond.
It wasn't asshole that accused Benaud of casual racism. Think it might have been short-pitched.I wasn't attacking you at all. I know enough of your posting history to know better.
I only jumped in when people started accusing benaud of malicious intent (you) and casual racism (some other poster, was it asshole?) because he refused to include the WI Pacers or Murali in his favorite 11. Which is ludicrous, even by your usual standards.
No I didn't.I wasn't attacking you at all. I know enough of your posting history to know better.
I only jumped in when people started accusing benaud of malicious intent (you) and casual racism (some other poster, was it asshole?) because he refused to include the WI Pacers or Murali in his favorite 11. Which is ludicrous, even by your usual standards.
Starc maybeYeah I'll cop Chanderpaul. KP too.
Apologies, replace my reference with Short pitched.No I didn't.
Just feels he is overrated here. Batted too down the order. And because he is Burgey's hero.I know your reasons for Hammond. Why Border?
I really like your slip fielding agenda. I'd incorporate it myself more if there was a more objective way to judge slippers I didn't see from decades ago than mythology and guesses. I just don't know enough about whether Peter May would be a good third slip option for example.But dude, I'm not trying to change anyone's mind, they are trying to change mine for some reason.
Dude, I posted a list.
The funny thing is that the only agenda I have here is to get a greater appreciation and consideration for slip fielding., Which isn't catching on btw
But hey if the batmen so their job, the tail becomes less important. If the bowlers do their job, the cordon becomes more important. But that's for another thread.
Yes I did, because it was.I wasn't attacking you at all. I know enough of your posting history to know better.
I only jumped in when people started accusing benaud of malicious intent (you) and casual racism (some other poster, was it asshole?) because he refused to include the WI Pacers or Murali in his favorite 11. Which is ludicrous, even by your usual standards.
Hey @Coronis - this is why I get away with the Viv thing more than you do. I have an even sillier one!I think you all forgot the OG. PEWS Lillee
With Hammond (and Weekes, yes Weekes) for example we can only use anecdotal evidence, but there are videos on you tube where you can see some of his catches. For Simpson, Sobers, Lloyd etc, anecdotal evidence as well, but also you can look for vids of the bowlers of their teams and that's where I see a quite a bit of catches as well as commentary, such as that's yet another magnificent catch by A, that's two now for the innings.I really like your slip fielding agenda. I'd incorporate it myself more if there was a more objective way to judge slippers I didn't see from decades ago than mythology and guesses. I just don't know enough about whether Peter May would be a good third slip option for example.
Ah so I just have to come up with something crazy that people will buy.Hey @Coronis - this is why I get away with the Viv thing more than you do. I have an even sillier one!
After they retire and I start saying more about it I reckon I'll cop it for Smith and Labuschagne too.
Go the other way on Hayden IMO. Samaraweera > Hayden.Ah so I just have to come up with something crazy that people will buy.
Like Hayden > Tendulkar but an original.
Does Langer > Greenidge count?Go the other way on Hayden IMO. Samaraweera > Hayden.
Do us (me) a favor and don't mention him again. Literally, no one is as biased as this dude. He used to argue for Warne being the best bowler ever and used to bring up expert opinion, yet when you did the same with Sobers, he completely disregarded it. He did the same with Lillee vs any other fast bowlers.What have the people of CW done to deserve this wall of text. Ikki would have been proud of this post. Except that you seem impervious to reason and just continue to push your agenda. Despite you being given so many arguments regarding all the supposed "issues" you mentioned about Imran you refuse to address the arguments and then continue on parroting your same old tired points that have been addressed. And OS and trundler just pointed out the inconsistency in your reasoning as the biggest problem which you never seem to address. And neither do you seem to address the substantive points of any of other people's arguments. Then you wonder why people are attacking you.
No not for Sobers, I argued for Marshall against Warne. I remember that. It was hilarious.Do us (me) a favor and don't mention him again. Literally, no one is as biased as this dude. He used to argue for Warne being the best bowler ever and used to bring up expert opinion, yet when you did the same with Sobers, he completely disregarded it. He did the same with Lillee vs any other fast bowlers.
Well no, he isn't the worst poster I've seen that would be Blocky but Ikki was something else.No not for Sobers, I argued for Marshall against Warne. I remember that. It was hilarious.
Ikki, added some colour to the forum though. Brought alternative viewpoints and made some interesting points. I think he shouldn't have left.