archie mac
International Coach
Hit the books sonComparing Miller to Imran as a bowler is just like comparing Rohan Kanhai to Garry Sobers as a batsman.
Hit the books sonComparing Miller to Imran as a bowler is just like comparing Rohan Kanhai to Garry Sobers as a batsman.
Speaking of, was just watching highlights of the 3rd Test at Lord's in 73 where Kanhai made 157 and Sobers made 150 in the first innings. Was magnificent stuff, Kanhai's last Test outside the WI as well.Comparing Miller to Imran as a bowler is just like comparing Rohan Kanhai to Garry Sobers as a batsman.
I for one dont rate Imran as a top 10 bowler, nor on the same tier Marshall Barnes and Hadlee...For me,Miller's 3.1 wickets per match,,just one 10WM & much much less wicket hauls as well.All these things count as much against him as abowler as Imran's not outs against him.Imran is in the same tier as Marshal,Barnes,Hadlee etc when it comes to bowlers while Miller is nowhere near that.
Is Imran one of the top 10 bowlers ever? Yes
Is Miller one of the top 10 bowlers ever? Not even top 20(would be somewhere around 25 to 30 for me).
He started with "For me," pretty much saying this is my opinion quite clearly.I for one dont rate Imran as a top 10 bowler, nor on the same tier Marshall Barnes and Hadlee...
I think it would annoy less people if you stated these things as your opinion, not as fact
Those bowlers don't make these lists doesn't mean top 10 lists are a waste of time.Most of people here give references of different players & ,journalists when it comes to discussing any player especially Sobers' position as an allrounder & thats the only argument you people have in favour of him(because his stats say the opposite),so if your argument that Miller is as good as any other alltime great bowler stands a leg,I would like you to do the same.Top ten lists are a waste of time, how many bowlers from the 1920s or 30s ever make these lists?
I agree with the first bit but not the second. I would rather just assume when someone writes something that it's their opinion. I think using silly abbreviations like IMO all over the place is worthless.I for one dont rate Imran as a top 10 bowler, nor on the same tier Marshall Barnes and Hadlee...
I think it would annoy less people if you stated these things as your opinion, not as fact
It's funny you say that though, I consider Miller above Sobers as an AR.You must understand that stats are all that matter to many on this site
How anyone who ever read about Test cricket, or had the pleasure of watching Sobers, could come to the conclusion that he is not the greatest AR in the history of the game is beyond me
That's because he bowled much less per test. That's like saying Muralitharan is better than Imran Khan because of 5fers and 10fers and because he takes more per test.For me,Miller's 3.1 wickets per match,,just one 10WM & much much less 5 wicket hauls as well.All these things count as much against him as abowler as Imran's not outs against him.Imran is in the same tier as Marshal,Barnes,Hadlee etc when it comes to bowlers while Miller is nowhere near that.
Is Imran one of the top 10 bowlers ever? Yes
Is Miller one of the top 10 bowlers ever? Not even top 20(would be somewhere around 25 to 30 for me).
Tell me number of those players or writers/journalists who consider Imran as one of the best & also those consider Miller in the top 10 or atleast as good as Imran.
Did you not read the Hutton quote?Those bowlers don't make these lists doesn't mean top 10 lists are a waste of time.Most of people here give references of different players & ,journalists when it comes to discussing any player especially Sobers' position as an allrounder & thats the only argument you people have in favour of him(because his stats say the opposite),so if your argument that Miller is as good as any other alltime great bowler stands a leg,I would like you to do the same.
Yes a couple of great writers and players agree with you (McCabe, Whitington), but I think Sobers by a littleIt's funny you say that though, I consider Miller above Sobers as an AR.
He din't say Miller is one of the greatest ever ,did he?Did you not read the Hutton quote?
Actually, you could argue stats-wise he is better than Imran. Just takes a bit of time and a leniency towards being unbiased about it - which I am not saying I am totally am and you are incapable of it, but just that a very sound argument can be made on stats that Sobers is better than Imran.Those bowlers don't make these lists doesn't mean top 10 lists are a waste of time.Most of people here give references of different players & ,journalists when it comes to discussing any player especially Sobers' position as an allrounder & thats the only argument you people have in favour of him(because his stats say the opposite),so if your argument that Miller is as good as any other alltime great bowler stands a leg,I would like you to do the same.
Agreed on point second and third. Imran do figures in top ten bowlers of all time on most ex players list, Miller is not ranked that highly.For me,Miller's 3.1 wickets per match,,just one 10WM & much much less 5 wicket hauls as well.All these things count as much against him as abowler as Imran's not outs against him.Imran is in the same tier as Marshal,Barnes,Hadlee etc when it comes to bowlers while Miller is nowhere near that.
Is Imran one of the top 10 bowlers ever? Yes
Is Miller one of the top 10 bowlers ever? Not even top 20(would be somewhere around 25 to 30 for me).
Tell me number of those players or writers/journalists who consider Imran as one of the best & also those consider Miller in the top 10 or atleast as good as Imran.
Actually, you could argue stats-wise he is better than Imran. Just takes a bit of time and a leniency towards being unbiased about it - which I am not saying I am totally am and you are incapable of it, but just that a very sound argument can be made on stats that Sobers is better than Imran.
Not in that quote, but he did say so many times Benaud also rated him one of the all time greats, and he has watched quite a fewHe din't say Miller is one of the greatest ever ,did he?
BTW,any other references?Because just one like that is not enough as compared to so many in favour of Imran Khan.
Imran Khan took more per tests than Muralitharan(thats if you exclude those 20 or 22 matches Imran played as a batsman during different phases of his career).That's because he bowled much less per test. That's like saying Muralitharan is better than Imran Khan because of 5fers and 10fers and because he takes more per test.
Well there is a lot of money at stakeFunny how Imran is now ahead having trailed all along. No doubt the new members list will show 6 new members in the last hour registered by the same person to distort the vote.