He'd be batting at 4 in this line-up anyway.We can never know. The point remains though that Shane Warne could have made us a better side by his own force of will alone, at 40 years old, with an exceptionally brittle batting line up, is ****ing ********
I'm not sure it's the same as him actually being the captain though. In that particular situation his influence may have been more divisive than if he was actually the captain.Yeah, and Australia lost the 2005 Ashes with him virtually leading the side, a side significantly better than the current lot.
It's cute and good looking.Why is that emoticon called 'Man' and not 'Cameron Burge'?
Take it easy. The post you responded to was nowhere near serious enough to warrant such a rant...I didn't think this ever needed to be pointed out because it was so ****ing obvious, but it's pretty ****ing hard to win games of cricket, which at the end of the day is about scoring more runs than your opposition, if you don't score any ****ing runs.
EDIT: I'll turn down the language if you like, mods, but this is part of a string of truly shocking posts that I've seen recently and part of a general trend I've seen too much of in the public.
and nearly won the series on his own during the day, and porking half of londons shielas at night.....Yeah, and Australia lost the 2005 Ashes with him virtually leading the side, a side significantly better than the current lot.
Notice the lack of wheelchair.Why is that emoticon called 'Man' and not 'Cameron Burge'?
Nearly won (aka 'lost') with the personal performance of a lifetime + an all time great side still equates to not winning with regular performances and the side Australia has now, no matter what positive spin you may want to put on it.and nearly won the series on his own during the day, and porking half of londons shielas at night.....
id say he would have made a fine leader!
Notice the lack of wheelchair.