Coming back to quote this again because I reckon it might be the stupidest post of all-timeI never said Bazball was a myth, in fact you may well recall that I fully expected NZ to lose every game to Bazball, which they duly did.
It's not a case of whether or not it'll work, it's a case of what's the point of playing cricket that is completely rank, unwatchable filth. Like, cricket is supposed to be a sporting contest which has fans willing to watch it and all that sorta jazz.
I agree with Thierry Henry too, gimh. Do you really believe you'll sustain interest if every team and every match start this aggressive game?Coming back to quote this again because I reckon it might be the stupidest post of all-time
You don't like it, fine, but the idea that the problem with is because cricket is supposed to be a sporting contest which has fans willing to watch it is so hilariously wide of the point that I can't get my head around the fact anyone, even one as lacking in self-awareness and empathy as th, has posted it.
Stokes has just eked a victory out of the flattest pitch of all-time and this numpty thinks his brand of cricket will turn viewers away from the sport. Okay then.
Big assumption here.I agree with Thierry Henry too, gimh. Do you really believe you'll sustain interest if every team and every match start this aggressive game?
When 400+ got cracked once in the sa-aus odi, it hooked us all with excitement in that game. But now every other odi gets a 350+ score and it is slowly resulting in a gradual demise of the format as it is not a balanced game between bat and ball anymore in odis. It is just an extended form of t20s.
If all teams adopt this bazball format and prepare pitches to suit it, tests will be extended odis and by extension, extended t20s. We will eventually lose interest in tests too. I believe bazball is the first step in turning traditional viewers away from the game.
Tbf I respect your opinion. I don't think the comparison carries though. The Stokes/McCullum approach is about aggressive cricket with bat and ball. It's only resulted in a huuuuuuge innings total in this game. it's had us chase some tricky targets and win games that look like meandering to a draw. Wickets have tumbled in all of the Stokes games, even this one had 37 whereas this wicket would classically have seen about 18 wickets across four dull af innings.I agree with Thierry Henry too, gimh. Do you really believe you'll sustain interest if every team and every match start this aggressive game?
When 400+ got cracked once in the sa-aus odi, it hooked us all with excitement in that game. But now every other odi gets a 350+ score and it is slowly resulting in a gradual demise of the format as it is not a balanced game between bat and ball anymore in odis. It is just an extended form of t20s.
If all teams adopt this bazball format and prepare pitches to suit it, tests will be extended odis and by extension, extended t20s. We will eventually lose interest in tests too. I believe bazball is the first step in turning traditional viewers away from the game.
I agree with this. It'[s part of why I don't think the ODI/T20 comparison holds.I honestly think you guys are doing a big disservice to both B Mac and Stokes by saying Bazball is only about hitting and scoring fast. I honestly it is just about letting players play the way they are most likely to succeed. Yes, they do believe in moving the game forward but not in some comical fashion. There is a lot of thought behind this process and it deserves to be respected IMHO.
I'm trying to imagine fans of other sport reacting like this. Football is my usual go-to and I just can't countenance a scenario where they'd say 'all these goals they're scoring is ridiculous and ruining the game'.ah old cricket fans gatekeeping the sport as usual nothing new to see here at all
Tangent but I reckon football definitely gets a streak of this. I don't remember which world cup it was but I recall people complaining about new balls that curve too much and can lead to more long range shots. And there's always some old gits who moan that players now have more skills and less capacity to kick the **** out of each other.I'm trying to imagine fans of other sport reacting like this. Football is my usual go-to and I just can't countenance a scenario where they'd say 'all these goals they're scoring is ridiculous and ruining the game'.
And rightfully so, DeChambeau is right ****Golfers hitting the ball too far is one that comes to mind. Some people got very upset at DeChambeau a couple of years back.
Great marketing though isn't it. Got people everywhere thinking they've invented something newEngland are just doing what Australia has generally done - try to win test matches instead of drawing them. It's nice to see them finally get the hint after 100-odd years.