Averaged 46.62 against teams other than Australia. Clearly he had a bogey team.
Mike Denness was never good enough to average 50+ in Test cricket. He didn't even average 40+ in FC cricket.
Averaged 46.50 against teams other than the West Indies. Understandable.
Without the gloves to consider, I have no doubt that Stewart could have averaged 50+ or at least pretty damn close to it. Fine batsman and good batsman-wicketkeeper.
Atherton averaged over 40 for most of his career and probably could have been a 50+ if not for various factos, not the least playing in a substandard England side that was almost unerringly overawed by Australia and the West Indies.
Hussain played above his ability and I have immense respect for him. He was one of those fighting, hardworking cricketers with a brilliant cricketing brain. In essence, he was England's Steve Waugh, if a less talented version.
Hussain made the best of his ability and went further with it. Class cricketer for that reason alone.
Had he retired after his 3rd Test, he would have averaged over 50.
Averaged 26.90 after his first 33 matches. Over his next 46 he averaged 40+. Against teams other than the West Indies, he averaged 45+.
Averaged 42.76 over his last 12 Tests before being dropped.
Averaged 26.26 over his first 31 Tests. From then on he averaged a commendable 41.73.
An allrounder so immense that his impact was massive regardless of a sub-50 batting average. Botham was never a good enough batsman to average 50+, but he was still outstanding and a great allrounder. His bowling average at that time 18.69.
See Denness.
An allrounder. Not expected to average over 50 in this day and age. That said, he does average over 40 over his last 40 Tests. Yet his batting average was 40.97 after his 26th Test.
See Randall.
Underachievers who blatantly can bat.