Richard
Cricket Web Staff Member
Just for your information, the (League Cup game) against York City was a terrible game full of terrible football from a terrible side who beat the third-string of a brilliant one.Neil Pickup said:As for better games, well, there's the Matthews Final, the 1970 World Cup Final, Man Utd losing York, Man Utd losing to Bournemouth, Man Utd's trip to Brazil ending in comedy against Necaxa...
The end may justify the means, but it can't make any bearing on the standard of play.
Just because I don't mind (in fact I would certainly be delighted to watch) if Lee, MacGill, Williams, Hauritz, Watson, Hogg or any other rubbish Australian bowler were to get smashed all over the ground by, for instance, an indescriminate slogger like Shahid Afridi at no point would I kid myself and call it "good" or "thrilling" cricket.
The 1970 WC final may have been brilliant (the Matthews final, maybe I should be ashamed, but I don't know what you're on about) but IMO it wasn't as action-packed as MU-Asnl in April 1999.
Just because you can't take it that a brilliant team won a brilliant match doesn't detract from the quality and variety of footballing action and drama.