Johan
Cricketer Of The Year
their home pitches motivates the younger players to choose spin and become dry fast turner monsters, leading to their seemingly endless supply of good home spinners.Took India a while.
their home pitches motivates the younger players to choose spin and become dry fast turner monsters, leading to their seemingly endless supply of good home spinners.Took India a while.
actually did thatAnderson vs Trueman is closer.
I have a feeling Bedser would win easily, I think Statham vs Larwood is the one where Larwood may winAlec Bedser and Larwood fights for the 4th spot ig.
Which is fine imo.I have a feeling Bedser would win easily, I think Statham vs Larwood is the one where Larwood may win
Have not heard of this list. Sounds like a fascinating one.1971. Gubby Allen , Ames, Fingleton and O'Reilly chose their 20 greatest cricketers since 1921.
Tate 4 votes, Bedser 3, Larwood 3, Statham 1, Trueman 1
As I recall, there were a few rather surprising selections, to say the least.Have not heard of this list. Sounds like a fascinating one.
Post from 2023.Have not heard of this list. Sounds like a fascinating one.
Classic Bradman.Post from 2023.
===============================================================================================
In 1971 The Cricketer magazine celebrated its 50th anniversary by asking four eminent senior figures to choose their greatest twenty cricketers since 1921. The four were Ames, Gubby Allen, O'Reilly and Fingleton. Bradman was invited but declined.
All four played most of their cricket during the 1930s, so one might expect a weighting towards that time and towards England and Australia. Ames and Allen later became selectors and administrators, the two Australians respected journalists.
All four judges voted for nine players: Bradman, Hobbs, Hammond, Hutton, Compton, Headley, Sobers, Lindwall and Tate.
Three votes were given to O'Reilly (was told to vote for himself but refused), Grimmett, Larwood, Bedser and McCabe.
Two nominations: Macartney, Ponsford, May, Worrell, Miller, Evans, Laker.
One: Barry Richards, Graeme Pollock, Weekes, Harvey, Hassett, Sutcliffe, Woolley, Leyland, Duleepsinhji, Rhodes, Trueman, Statham, Mailey, Freeman.
With 21 cricketers receiving two or more nominations, editor Swanton had to remove one to leave an overall Top 20. He removed Laker on the grounds of meeting "only limited success outside England."
Fingleton's comments were the most interesting, especially when quoting Herbie Collins' opinion that Headley was the most complete batsman he ever saw. Fingleton signed off by saying: "I must stress, finally, that statistics didn't matter a tinker's cuss with me. I estimated capacity and individualism. I looked at the subject in memory's eye."
===============================================================================================
All four voted for Bradman, Hobbs, Hammond, Hutton, Compton, Headley, Sobers, Lindwall and Tate.Interesting that Ames himself received no votes. Neither Oldfield nor Tallon either.
I assume who each individual voted for was not revealed?
Barnes is likely as they never saw him play. See they didn't vote for Grace or Trumper either0 votes for Barnes
Just 1 vote for Sutcliffe
Surprising
0 votes for Barnes
Just 1 vote for Sutcliffe
Surprising
In 1971 The Cricketer magazine celebrated its 50th anniversary by asking four eminent senior figures to choose their greatest twenty cricketers since 1921
Because stats aren't everything and neither Barrington nor Sutcliffe were, as I referenced in another thread, that especially highly rated during their time. Greats yes, but Sutcliffe wasn't nearly as highly rated as Hammond, Hobbs or Hutton.0 votes for Barnes
Just 1 vote for Sutcliffe
Surprising
Every time I read something about the gentleman, I'm more intrigued.The Tiger obviously relented on his modesty with age, because in the 1980s when asked to choose his all time Australian XI by selecting himself and ten others, he did actually follow the instructions and picked himself in the team!