PlayerComparisons
International Vice-Captain
.
Once this reaches 20 million or so, it is India all the way.Australia best bat > India best bat.
Australia second best bat > India second best bat.
and so on
How?Chappell easily.
Might as well rate Anderson higher than Lillee based on that logic then lolChappell was a coward who didn't face enough of the overseas challenges that other batsmen of his era did.
Might as well rate Anderson higher than Lillee based on that logic then lol
More aggressive bat, tougher era, WSC record, better rated.How?
You forgot he barely played in subcontinent, less longetivity than Dravid, mostly batted at no 4 unlike Dravid.More aggressive bat, tougher era, WSC record, better rated.
Completely irrelevant and pointless metrics.WSC record, better rated.
Could apply to any of saltshakerz's posts, esp. about Indian cricketers and cricket.Completely irrelevant and pointless metrics.
WSC was against quite a high level of bowling.Completely irrelevant and pointless metrics.
You could pretty much say that with Australia and almost every other test nation. Which is disturbing. Let's have a look since I have no life and I'm bored:Australia best bat > India best bat.
Australia second best bat > India second best bat.
and so on
wot, Chappell is a better player than Headley because longevity?Chappell > Headley (longevity)
Anderson > Hoggard so it flows naturally that Anderson > Lillee.Might as well rate Anderson higher than Lillee based on that logic then lol
I'd rate George higher myself but I think the consensus is that George didn't play enough tests to be ranked above some other atg who played significantly more.wot, Chappell is a better player than Headley because longevity?