• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Greatest All Time ODI XI

Red

The normal awards that everyone else has
In a way you are doing the same , Symonds not even close to Dhoni , Lara or Ponting as a batsman, and his secondary skill will not be needed most of the times when you have 5 better bowlers and 2 part timers .


Azharudin - India's best fielder in last 30 years imo. Selection justified.

Btw who is better odi Batsman between Azhar and Symonds ?
I dont even know what you're trying to argue. I am picking Symonds in an all time XI because he's justified as a power hitter, decent bowling option and the best fielder of all time. Adds a heap to any ODI team.

If you want to pick Azhar over Kohli in yours, by all means go for it. It's stupid, but feel free.
 

Pap Finn Keighl

International Debutant
I dont even know what you're trying to argue. I am picking Symonds in an all time XI because he's justified as a power hitter, decent bowling option and the best fielder of all time. Adds a heap to any ODI team.

If you want to pick Azhar over Kohli in yours, by all means go for it. It's stupid, but feel free.
Azhar over Kohli , Symonds over Dhoni/Lara.. which one is more stupid ?

You picked him as a specialist Batsman,Not as an allrounder. Who needs a 6 th bowler in an ODi team ?
 

stephen

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Azhar over Kohli , Symonds over Dhoni/Lara.. which one is more stupid ?

You picked him as a specialist Batsman,Not as an allrounder. Who needs a 6 th bowler in an ODi team ?
Azhar over Kohli is a million times more stupid that Symonds over Dhoni/Lara as a middle order hitter and all rounder, particularly if you've already got Bevan in the side (and therefore don't need or want Dhoni).

And having an extra bowling option definitely helps a captain win games. Murali got hit for 90 runs for no wickets in a game. Don't you think his captain might have considered switching to a part timer for a couple of overs instead of continuing bowling Murali that game?
 

Pap Finn Keighl

International Debutant
Azhar over Kohli is a million times more stupid that Symonds over Dhoni/Lara as a middle order hitter and all rounder, particularly if you've already got Bevan in the side (and therefore don't need or want Dhoni).

And having an extra bowling option definitely helps a captain win games. Murali got hit for 90 runs for no wickets in a game. Don't you think his captain might have considered switching to a part timer for a couple of overs instead of continuing bowling Murali that game?
In such rare occasions , you go for part timers like Sachin or Viv. It happens only once in 10 matches.
It's like selecting kallis and Botham above Garner and McGrath after losing a match by 20 runs with 5 overs to spare.
 

Top