I want to start a thread to discuss this whole world cup final obsession in rating players. But it will probably be a **** show with old arguments repeated.Murali played 5 WCs and averaged under 20 in 3 of them. In the '07 one he averaged 15 ffs.
But of course that doesn't really count because he failed against the greatest ODI team ever in the Finals, where he started his spell bowling to a rampaging Gilchrist and still hit his pads 3 times in the over before his fellow bowlers were taken to the cleaners.
Imagine using a sample size of literally one match to have a "big black mark" against someones 500+ wicket career.
Yeah I've been saying this for years. Warne was great but I would literally pick Hogg ahead of him in any "ATG"-ish side. Better bat, better fielder and possibly even a better white-ball bowler.Heck, Hogg was an adequate replacement for Warne. I do think he's underrated but you'd deservedly get laughed out of the room if you implied he's better than Saqlain or Murali.
No, he's just more likely to win big matches you choose to not conveniently ignore.I say Warne was more likely to win big matches than either, based mostly on the big matches that he won. Not doing quite as well in the occasional low key tri series is just not as high on the radar.
Why is there always some India v Australia **** fight here latelyI swear, Australian posters lose around 20% of their brain cells when talking about their players. A truly Burgey-esque commitment to being wrong.
You wanted it this way right. Borrowing from your comments from the Dhoni thread and cricketsavant's posts there .Why is there always some India v Australia **** fight here lately
not sure what you mean tbhYou wanted it this way right. Borrowing from your comments from the Dhoni thread and cricketsavant's posts there .
I was referring to the below. By the way, my observation is that the instances of the fans of the 2 countries having a go at each other have reduced over the last year or so.not sure what you mean tbh
it's fun now and again but it's just never ending lately. You can make fun of someone's dumb posting without saying "this nationality's fans are always x"
seriously can we just ignore this guy? sure it's great that everyone has a common enemy but he's clearly just manufacturing pure garbage and everyone is replying to it with the same corrections multiple times. It's boring. Honestly I prefer it when we're at each other's throats.
Guess I don't know what I wantI was referring to the below. By the way, my observation is that the instances of the fans of the 2 countries having a go at each other have reduced over the last year or so.
While I agree the biggest factor is probably luck if you’re talking about a couple of games here and there, I disagree with it being a mythical ability.I want to start a thread to discuss this whole world cup final obsession in rating players. But it will probably be a **** show with old arguments repeated.
Anyway, I have always held it is more down to chance than some mythical ability to play well in world cup finals. Someone who has a weakness against bounce doesn't suddenly become a good player of bounce in wc finals due to this mythical ability. And pressure is equal on both sides so that factor cancels out (it's not like one team plays wc final and other a JAMODI).
It will start back in right earnest when India tour over there this winter. Can't wait TBHI was referring to the below. By the way, my observation is that the instances of the fans of the 2 countries having a go at each other have reduced over the last year or so.
I don't disagree that clutch players is a thing. I just disagree that all performances in wc finals are down to clutchness.While I agree the biggest factor is probably luck if you’re talking about a couple of games here and there, I disagree with it being a mythical ability.
There’s definitely clutch players out there as well as the opposite. For example I would honestly take Stokes over Kohli in certain situations because the man just pulls things out of his ass every now and again that shouldn’t be possible.
Conversely I would back a few spinners over Ashwin to bowl me to victory on a day 5 overseas wicket because the latter just loses the plot too often when the team depends solely on him.
That's fair too. Stokes was not miles away from not winning that game. And Kohli has played some superb knocks coming from behind. One that stands out is the world t20 game knocking out Australia in 2016. There have been plenty others too.There is a lot of luck and fine margins in these kinds of "clutch" assessments TBH and I am generally skeptical about them, unless there are obvious instances of a player wilting under the pressure and failing to execute basics (like Zaheer Khan in the World Cup final or Harmison in Ashes 2006). I don't think Kohli can be accused of not bringing his best under pressure.
Yeah but sunilz has ****ed off which has only been a good thing.I was referring to the below. By the way, my observation is that the instances of the fans of the 2 countries having a go at each other have reduced over the last year or so.