• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Generation Draft

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
yep... there is no point in allowing you to pick a player that others chose not to pick because the rules didn't allow us to.
 

smash84

The Tiger King
You're all just mad because you didn't think to pick him.
He isn't that good that people are mad that they didn't think of picking him.

I actually even counted his matches until the end of 1950 but they came a few short of the 50% mark.

But rules must be followed.

Marc is right. Then someone in this round would pick Bradman. What do you say to that?
 

Pothas

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
This is boring now, lets just get on with it.

GF seems to have quit so let that be that, really not a matter of life and death is it?
 
Last edited:

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
nah juz wanted to ensure Compton was available for next round.. Otherwise, I am fine with us moving on with the draft.
 

Furball

Evil Scotsman
I'd like a valid reason why a player who scored the majority of his runs isn't eligible for that era please.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
soI pick Bradman.
I'm going to join the draft late - to hell with the sign-up dealine rule - and pick this team:

1. Jack Hobbs
2. Len Hutton
3. Don Bradman
4. George Headley
5. Sachin Tendulkar
6. Garfield Sobers
7. Adam Gilchrist
8. Imran Khan
9. Richard Hadlee
10. Bill O'Reilly
11. Muttiah Muralitharan
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
I'd like a valid reason why a player who scored the majority of his runs isn't eligible for that era please.
Because that's not the rule. The rules are clearly outlined earlier in the thread; whether or not you agree with them isn't relevant. If you were going to bring it up you should have done it before the draft started or at least before the round started as others looked into picking him before you did.
 
Last edited:

Top