capt_Luffy
Cricketer Of The Year
Kapil's career: 1978-94Vaas had the longevity in ODI game.
Vaas' career: 1994-08
Yeah......
Kapil's career: 1978-94Vaas had the longevity in ODI game.
322 vs 225 matches yeah I see.Kapil's career: 1978-94
Vaas' career: 1994-08
Yeah......
You better see, because I even expected you to know that longevity matters on years more, not no. Of games played, which heavily depends on games available and ODIs became much more frequent later on, especially in the late 90s early 2000s. Man how much willfully ignorant someone can be for their point......322 vs 225 matches yeah I see.
Longevity is matches and wickets last time I saw. More the matches per year, more work for a fast bowler. Hence more matches are important than more years. Man how much willfully ignorant someone can be for their point......You better see, because I even expected you to know that longevity matters on years more, not no. Of games played, which heavily depends on games available and ODIs became much more frequent later on, especially in the late 90s early 2000s. Man how much willfully ignorant someone can be for their point......
Lol..... So last time you saw wrong. If your point for matches being a better indicator is work rate, then just remember that Kapil missed only one Test in his 16 years career and was regularly bowling 12-14 over spells in that time. That's plenty more work for a bowler to wear down, much more than Vaas ever did.Longevity is matches and wickets last time I saw. More the matches per year, more work for a fast bowler. Hence more matches are important than more years. Man how much willfully ignorant someone can be for their point......
Yeah totes I rate Kevin Pietersen more highly than Garry Sobers re: longevity.Longevity is matches and wickets last time I saw. More the matches per year, more work for a fast bowler. Hence more matches are important than more years. Man how much willfully ignorant someone can be for their point......
Yeah sounds right. Also that rightfully justifies Jadeja>bradmanYeah totes I rate Kevin Pietersen more highly than Garry Sobers re: longevity.
This argument is perfectly showcases when it comes to amount of grey matter.Yeah totes I rate Kevin Pietersen more highly than Garry Sobers re: longevity.
imo Warne had better longevity than Murali. Played more matches. Same with Cook and Jaya/Sanga.This argument is perfectly showcases when it comes to amount of grey matter.
That would have been a case if Warne had figures similar to Murali or Cook to Sanga.imo Warne had better longevity than Murali. Played more matches. Same with Cook and Jaya/Sanga.