Think I've already addressed this:
And I think not. As I say - the fact that they have played for England shows that they really don't mind. If they did, nothing would make them do so.
It's more to do with sporting loyalty than political boundaries. "Ireland" as a political entity doesn't exist. It's a sporting construct in the same way as the West Indies is. "Ireland" also put out a united team in union. They play together because they want to, but if they wanted to play as Eire & Northern Ireland that would be fine too.
And it'd also be fine if they wanted to play as part of the British Isles.
Hardly. As stedly points out:
So? Cricket in Ireland and Scotland at the current time has some additional strength (admittedly more due to imports than anything else, but still, there is an amount of increased interest) than it has in the past, and while it'd be utterly foolhardy to think that this would ever amount to international-standard sides, it could help hugely in developing a better "England" team.
Well, no, it hasn't. Great Britain as a team used to compete in the Olympic football competition (won 3 gold medals) and the British & Irish Lions still tour every 4 years. Despite these supranational teams, the constituent parts of Great Britain/The British Isles still desire to have their own national teams and play against each other. Why should cricket be the exception?
There's no reason England and Ireland shouldn't play each other internally if they fancy; England and "Wales" played a few games a few years ago as you remember. But Wales remain, even in official terms, part of the cricket entity most commonly known as "England". It'd be best for everyone concerned if Ireland and Scotland did the same. If time could be found, obviously an internal tri-series might be good fun.
That's crap. Do you really think Ireland & Scotland never conceived of international recognition until the ICC flashed its garter belt?
When did I say that? I said I$C$C can pretend they're expanding cricket by pretending Ireland and Scotland are "new" places, when they're nothing of the sort, the way Afghanistan or China (for instance) would be. And this annoys me; had The British Isles decided in 1997 to form one, rather than three, Cricket Boards, that'd have been 2 teams less (or 2 even worse ones) at WC2007 and I$C$C would have had less excuse to continue this "we're expanding cricket" nonsense.
Wales have also had ambitions in this area at some point or else why would they have competed in the qualifying tournament for the 1975 world cup?
I know they did (this was before they became officially - and correctly - recognised as part of "England"). Let's hope we don't get Glamorgan breaking away and trying to form their own Test team any time again, though.