Furball
Evil Scotsman
My initial point was in response to Shri, as was the table.it is selective because he is not quoting the irrelevant part
My initial point was in response to Shri, as was the table.it is selective because he is not quoting the irrelevant part
Sure. If you're going by stats alone.this still doesn't excuse the fact that you made a wrong statement in your rebuttal to Shri
It is selective because that's what smalishah quoted in the first placeYour first quote is a bit selective is it not? Also missing a quote from Shri.
lol......so do you finally admit that you made a wrong statement?Sure. If you're going by stats alone.
Asif owned England's top order. Ajmal didn't.
Why?I don't think Swann will find as much success in sub cont/ME as he finds in England. Swann is a bowler who relies a lot on drift and he will not get the same amount of drift in SC/ME as he gets in UK. Also he has to contend with Misbah and Younis this time the two are possibly the best batsman of spin from Pakistan in the last 20 years.
No it's not mate, it's about England beating India every day of the week.But the topic was about whether or not Ajmal got 'owned' in England..
Hey Benchy, brothers 1, 2 and 3 are ganging up again.
haha.....I think Agent is referring to Benchy's jibes in OT in the thread "phrases that should be banned on CW"
Yeah I know but as sledger and I weren't here defending our step brother I have no idea what Agent is on abouthaha.....I think Agent is referring to Benchy's jibes in OT in the thread "phrases that should be banned on CW"
Blind optimism at that.Optimistic tstl