Jono said:Not Ponting
![]()
![Laugh :laugh: :laugh:](/forum/images/smilies/original/laugh.gif)
Jono said:Not Ponting
![]()
Dude I'm just screwing with you, we both know you haven't done that. I was just trying to see how you'd react.marc71178 said:OK then, please show me where I have excused England's performances because we won the Ashes?
Were you raised in India, or are you just one of those creeps who goes for a country they aren't even from?Jono said:Not Ponting
![]()
I was using Rand because I don't think they have a currency in Zimbabwe any more?!Son Of Coco said:You left out the 'g' on 'rand'...![]()
Don't you think you are basically defending Lara here? On a pitch like that, there wasn't really much of a chance of a result, realistically speaking and almost all the commentators around agreed to that. The best chance of a win was to put England under some psychological pressure of a 700+ score and a world record. In fact, I still think that was the only reason they were in a bit of trouble in the first dig. That was a beauty to bat on. Some of us could have scored double figures there, against the Aussie bowling line up in fact.James90 said:It really is no wonder that Ponting was victim of a nightclub brawl. The difference between Lara and Ponting's declarations was simple. Lara batted until mid Day 3 on a flatter pitch than Perth with a poor bowling attack giving himself two days to bowl a decent batting lineup twice. He could have declared much earlier if he hasn't got the runs "himself".
With Ponting neither side batted 120 overs in the first innings and the pitch wasn't as good for batting as in St Johns. South Africa were still adapting to the conditions and had to face McGrath and Warne who is at his very best. He declared so as to get "someone else" a significant milestone and to make sure they couldn't lose the match which might be a bit defensive but it's not stupid or selfish. The West Indies were never going to lose by the time they had 600 and didn't need to bat on.
A better team. What about you, sir?dontcloseyoureyes said:Hey Indian dudes who like to bring up the Ashes.
Who beat you guys at home? Ya.
Some of the lost Windies pride came back with that 400 not out. I doubt if a victory was possible on that flat track. And how much would it really mean compared to a 400 not out after the hammering and the series already lost.James90 said:The West Indies were never going to lose by the time they had 600 and didn't need to bat on.
I think Australia learned a valuable lesson during the Ashes.honestbharani said:A better team. What about you, sir?
I know what you mean Barney. He used to irritate me once.Barney Rubble said:See above post - I love watching him bat, but rather like a large number of footballers, there's just some unknown quality about him I don't like. Maybe it's the ears.
We 'urned' those bragging-rights (dontcloseyoureyes said:I like how you use the ashes as a defence, and also a weapon. You're a multi-dimensional man.![]()
The problem being that he doesnt know how to spell it, define it or use it.luckyeddie said:We 'urned' those bragging-rights ().
(and promptly threw them away again).
Regarding Ricky Ponting being a whiner - sure he is, but really his problem is just one of diplomacy.
You know its a bad decision by an Aussie when it's sufficient to put a smile on a Pom's face during the dead of Winter.PY said:
I was watching the Ashes highlights last night and I couldn't help but smile to myself when he put England in at Edgbaston and possibly evened things up in terms of mental edge.
They haven't been released yet.social said:You know its a bad decision by an Aussie when it's sufficient to put a smile on a Pom's face during the dead of Winter.
BTW, why werent you watching highlights of the Pakistani series?
Or did you do that between courses?
OK, if they had been released, I should have said "between pints."PY said:They haven't been released yet.
What do you mean by courses? Christmas isn't until 2 days time and I only finished working yesterday so haven't started festivities ie ramming my face full of lovely Christmassy food.![]()
![]()
There is no "between pints" - I prefer the Irish approach when you order your next when the current one has a couple of inches to go. Once people realise that, then you will never have to face that terrible embarrassment of having to turn offered drinks down again, or (even worse) saying 'I will just have a half'.social said:OK, if they had been released, I should have said "between pints."
That should read 'alcoholics' Eddie.luckyeddie said:(having a few whiskeys lined up is the alcohol equivalent of a multiple orgasm)
True - but in my case, the terms are synom.... simmonimmm... sirnobin... sminomern... surnamern.... surinam..... the same.PY said:That should read 'alcoholics' Eddie.
Good to see you back by the way.![]()