• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Do you care about over rates enough to support penalties?

Do you care about over rates?


  • Total voters
    37

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Would awarding runs based on the number of overs short x run rate work

Match ref to hand out demerits for obvious time wasting cases like going out to bat with two right hand gloves etc
 

Line and Length

Cricketer Of The Year
Fines should suffice. To an extent, batsmen can affect the over rate. For example, if they are scoring freely and fieldsmen are frequently recovering boundary shots or if there is a left/right handed combination requiring frequent field changes.
Australia's tactic of attacking Leach in the 1st Test meant fewer overs of spin were sent down, hence a slower over rate.
 

Midwinter

State Captain
In T20 match or a ODI teams dont have any problems bowling the required overs in the allotted time despite high scoring.

So why cant they bowl the required overs in a test ?
 

Immenso

International Vice-Captain
Should be docked 1 penalty run every time a mid-off or mid-on fires the ball back at the keeper. So that the second slip can shine it....
 

Immenso

International Vice-Captain
On more serious note. I voted yes yo docking WTC points. But the amount they can get docked is way out of whack for points available from a match.
 

Victor Ian

International Coach
Would awarding runs based on the number of overs short x run rate work
Give the batting team the number of runs scored in their X best overs as extras.
I imagine short overs are a problem because it means less adds, which is where most money comes from.

I hoped to scour the commentary to see if I could see where the time was wasted, but couldn't find time stamps. They should include that so we can all point the finger.
 

Starfighter

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
In T20 match or a ODI teams dont have any problems bowling the required overs in the allotted time despite high scoring.
Yeah they do. ODIs here often finish a at least couple of overs overtime and T20s (BBL and internationals) seem to get more protracted each year.
 
Last edited:

Bijed

International Regular
If a slow over-rate is deliberate in a cynical, time-wastey way then yes I care, but you'd need the punishment to affect the current match (plus fines/bans if you want to). Tbf I don't feel like this is something that happens much anyway.

Otherwise, it's not something that I actually massively care about, although the "spectators don't care if they see 90 overs or 86" is a bit glib. Obviously I don't care about the specific number of overs I see (I'm not about to go all "I paid for 90 overs and saw 89. I demand a refund!") but it does start to lessen the experience a little bit in the moment when you're watching someone like Shannon Gabriel trudge slowly back to their mark in about twice the time anyone else takes. It's only minor, but my point is it's easy to not care about that sort of thing at all if you're watching on TV/cricinfo, forgetting that the spectators in the ground might have a different view of things.
 

Spikey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
In T20 match or a ODI teams dont have any problems bowling the required overs in the allotted time despite high scoring.

So why cant they bowl the required overs in a test ?
they do all the time. part of the reason for The Hundred is pretty clearly to get the game actually wrapped up in 3 hours. the original T20 rules had something there for run penalties if the over rate wasn't good enough but they got removed at some point
 

tony p

State Regular
The umpires should be docked 50% of their pay for allowing it to happen.
So often they just stand there while watching the 12th man bring on drinks, towels, aftershave, newspapers.

They are mainly to blame for it, they don't give decisions anymore, but they could at least get both the batting & fielding teams into position much quicker.
 

trundler

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Over-rate penalties are an essential deterrent against dreadful 60 over days and deliberate time-wasting. Don't think that's even up for debate.
 

Spikey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
and yet almost none of the over-rate penalties they have in place combat that
 

Top