GraemeSmith
School Boy/Girl Captain
Australian Sehwag
Another instance where Jack is spot on. Very much the Simon Taufel among CW posters and mods, IMO.Warner naturally favours the off-side, very strong through point.
In longer forms of the game, he thrives on width; the "width predator" tag that James Brayshaw is very correct. He opens himself up in Twenty20 cricket to allow him a swinging arc when the ball is over the pegs.
I think he could quite definitely be a quality first class cricketer, if given a chance to bat as himself, and at number 5 or 6. That's where he's made to play in the longer forms of the game. He was seen as a super finisher in OD cricket as a youth, and I think he could possibly carve out a role like that in the future.
SehWAGInteresting comparing the thoughts on Warner on CW over the last two years compared to what Sehwag immediately thought of him:
Australia v New Zealand, 1st Test, Brisbane: What Virender Sehwag saw in David Warner | Cricket News | Australia v New Zealand | ESPN Cricinfo
Virender Sehwag saw the Test batsman in David Warner before he realised it himself. Drawn towards a Twenty20 career before his methods matured, Warner was in Delhi when Sehwag helpfully suggested the man synonymous with cricket's shortest form would make a better player in its longest.
The conversation startled Warner, at that stage still yet to receive a baggy blue cap for New South Wales. But Sehwag was prescient, for little more than two years later, Warner is about to open the batting for Australia in a Test match against New Zealand. It has helped that others, Greg Chappell among them, also saw the potential for far more than 20 overs' racy batting.
"Two years ago when I went to Dehli, Sehwag watched me a couple of times and said to me, 'You'll be a better Test cricketer than what you will be a Twenty20 player'," Warner recalled. "I basically looked at him and said, 'mate, I haven't even played a first-class game yet'. But he said, 'All the fielders are around the bat, if the ball is there in your zone you're still going to hit it. You're going to have ample opportunity to score runs. You've always got to respect the good ball, but you've always got to punish the ball you always punish'."
The conversation with Sehwag may have been the start of Warner's drive towards batsmanship worthy of a Test match, but it was also helped along by Chappell. On the Australia A tour of Zimbabwe, Cricket Australia's national talent manager told Warner his brief sessions in the nets were not going to prepare him for lengthier innings, and encouraged a more longwinded approach. It worked.
I still think he's too boundary-reliant in general for one day cricket bar the odd freak innings; I've said so for ages. Probably does need to bat seven or so just as a power hitter really. Sehwag was spot on when he suggested his style would suit the longer version more as long as he got his head and his defence right, which he seems to have.Still think though down the order is an option in ODers.
Nah, the IPL will come out and say Australia's batting woes were fixed thanks to the IPLIf Warner succeeds will some Indian paper claim that Australia's batting woes were fixed by Sehwag?
Egg, face.He hasn't embarassed himself in t20, but I doubt he'll ever get a baggy green