tooextracool
International Coach
He's test class but thats just about it. Unless hell has frozen over and averaging 37 while playing the majority of your tests in the subcontinent is considered to be the hallmark of a quality bowler.
Off my head i dont recall Kaneria ever ripping through taking 5 for 25-50 againts a major side. Ever time i see or read a scorecard of PAK game he is always 5 for 100 7 for 150 etc, thats why i struggle to rate him much although he is decent..He chokes when the pressure is on him to perform not unlike many of his team mates, is quite skillful but just can't make it to the next level.
what crap support bowlers Asif & Shoaib.Figures like 7/188, 5/150 say more about the lack of quality in the bowling backing him up than they do about Kaneria himself.
If the pitch is turning it automatically makes Asif less dangerous as there will not be much swing around. Akhtar wouldn't be in the field during long spells and wart not to support Kaneria anyway.what crap support bowlers Asif & Shoaib.
haha...agree about Akhtar though harsh on Asif he's like any other good bowler lethal when conditions suit him and keeps it tight when they don't, last test both innings were an excellent example of how he usually bowls.If the pitch is turning it automatically makes Asif less dangerous as there will not be much swing around. Akhtar wouldn't be in the field during long spells and wart not to support Kaneria anyway.![]()
Yeah, I might have overdone the Asif part. Let my personal rating of his bowling get in the way. Didn't say he was useless though, just said it made him less dangerous.haha...agree about Akhtar though harsh on Asif he's like any other good bowler lethal when conditions suit him and keeps it tight when they don't, last test both innings were an excellent example of how he usually bowls.
It's true though. When one of your bowlers is taking 7/180, presumably in about 50 overs of bowling, the others just aren't getting the job done at the other end.what crap support bowlers Asif & Shoaib.
Haha yeah this is so true. It was even worse in '07 when he tried to split his bowling 50-50 between leg breaks and googlies.He's like a leg-spinning version of Monty. He just bowls, and bowls, and doesn't really seem to think that much about what he's bowling to, and why he's bowling the way that he is.
Most cases i would think so, but i'm not sure if bowling a spell of 50-180-7 = the other bowlers not getting the job done. Since Kaneria has had quality pace bowling support at times.It's true though. When one of your bowlers is taking 7/180, presumably in about 50 overs of bowling, the others just aren't getting the job done at the other end.
Yeah, the only bowler who could take 7/150 without ineffective support is Cullen Bailey.It's true though. When one of your bowlers is taking 7/180, presumably in about 50 overs of bowling, the others just aren't getting the job done at the other end.
You're not really thinking about it properly IMO. If a bowler actually has the chance to bowl 50 overs and takes seven of the available ten wickets, even if he opens the bowling and stays on unchanged all day, whoever bowling from other end is doing **** all regardless of what his name is.Most cases i would think so, but i'm not sure if bowling a spell of 50-180-7 = the other bowlers not getting the job done. Since Kaneria has had quality pace bowling support at times.
Haa well if i haven't thought it through properly, i think you have thought about it too much my friendYou're not really thinking about it properly IMO. If a bowler actually has the chance to bowl 50 overs and takes seven of the available ten wickets, even if he opens the bowling and stays on unchanged all day, whoever bowling from other end is doing **** all regardless of what his name is.
The only ways it'd be possible to take 7/180 with genuinely good support were
a) if you were going at about 9 runs per over; or
b) if you could bowl from both ends.
A is completely unheard of in Test cricket and B is against the laws of the game.