CW Ranks the Bowlers

[The Sean]

1. Shane Warne
2. Sydney Barnes

 

[adharcric]

Barnes - 19
Hadlee - 11
McGrath - 10
Ambrose - 8
Akram - 3
Muralitharan - 2
Lillee - 2
Grimmett - 2
Wisden - 2
Warne - 2
O'Reilly - 1
Younis - 1

 

[Migara]

1. Murali
2. Barnes

 

[steve132]

1. Murali
2. Lillee

(Assuming that Marshall has already been selected as No. 1 overall).

 

[suhk_j]

muralitharan (action not withstanding)
marshall

hon mention to mcgrath and barnes

 

[adharcric]

Vote for #3 bowler of all-time

Barnes wins it rather comfortably in the end.

1. Malcolm Marshall
2. Sydney Barnes

The vote for the #3 bowler of all-time begins now.

 

[HeathDavisSpeed]

1. Ambrose
2. Waqar Younis

 

[Athlai]

Hadlee
Ambrose

 

[KiWiNiNjA]

Hadlee
McGrath

 

[adharcric]

1. McGrath
2. Hadlee

 

[The_Bunny]

1. Mcgrath
2. Ambrose

 

[bagapath]

mcgrath
oreilly

 

[Athlai]

McGrath 7
Hadlee 5
Ambrose 4
Waqar 1
O'Reilly 1

 

[Michaelf7777777]

1. Clarrie Grimmett
2. Richard Hadlee

 

[Burgey]

1. McGrath
2. Warne

 

[Fusion]

1. Hadlee
2. Ambrose

 

[subshakerz]

Hadlee for number 3.

 

[Magrat Garlick]

1 Murali
2 McGarth

 

[BoyBrumby]

1) CEL Ambrose
2) Waqar Younis

Big Curtly was McGrath, essentially but quicker and cooler and Waqar in his pomp was the best I've seen. His toe-crushing inswinging 90mph+ yorker seemingly delivered at will was a thing of destructive beauty.

 

[HeathDavisSpeed]

1) CEL Ambrose
2) Waqar Younis

Big Curtly was McGrath, essentially but quicker and cooler and Waqar in his pomp was the best I've seen. His toe-crushing inswinging 90mph+ yorker seemingly delivered at will was a thing of destructive beauty.

Agree with you on 100% of that. My exact reasons for having exactly the same selections.