CW Ranks the Bowlers

[Fusion]

Wasim
Waqar

 

[funnygirl]

O'Reilly

I know u would do that!

Wasim
Holding

 

[subshakerz]

Wasim

 

[Slifer]

Trueman'
Allan Donald

 

[BoyBrumby]

1) Waqar Younis
2) Fred Trueman

Can't whack a bit of sphincter-loosening pace.

Still.

 

[fredfertang]

And again - I am often wrong but seldom admit it

Harold Larwood
Jim Laker

 

[Michaelf7777777]

1. Grimmett
2. Lindwall

 

[a massive zebra]

Trueman
Laker

 

[adharcric]

1. Wasim
2. Garner

Wasim - 17
Trueman - 13
Garner - 6
Waqar - 5
Lindwall - 4
Larwood - 3
Laker/Grimmett - 2 each
Thomson/Donald/Holding - 1 each

 

[rivera213]

1- Lillee

Poor management cost him an extra 100 test wickets IMO.

There are about 15 bowlers ranked No. 2, but it's hard to compare a swinger like Waqar Younis to Curtly Ambrose even if both could make you look stupid with 1 delivery.

 

[SJS]

I know u would do that!

Wasim
Holding

 

[SJS]

You're dead to me.

Wasim
Trueman

I am dead Period

 

[adharcric]

1- Lillee

Poor management cost him an extra 100 test wickets IMO.

There are about 15 bowlers ranked No. 2, but it's hard to compare a swinger like Waqar Younis to Curtly Ambrose even if both could make you look stupid with 1 delivery.

Lillee's already in at #8, we're currently voting for #11 (you're supposed to provide a primary as well as secondary choice) - go back a few pages for the current list.

 

[Johnners]

1. Garner
2. Trueman

 

[Noble One]

Wasim
Lindwall

 

[DaRick]

1) Fred Trueman
2) Wasim Akram

 

[SJS]

You're dead to me.

Wasim
Trueman

I know u would do that!

Wasim
Holding

I am learning the value of strategic voting. Its fun even though I am not always voting for my favourite

 

[zaremba]

Garner
Wasim

Wouldn't mind those two opening the bowling for my all-time World XI (in ODIs definitely; in Tests maybe)

 

[weldone]

Wasim is getting a truckload of votes, and Davidson strangely isn't getting any. So, my primary vote goes to Davidson, and secondary to Wasim (wouldn't mind to vote the other way).

1. Allan Davidson
2. Wasim Akram

And yes, I give up on Lohmann, at last. The Lohmanns and the Spofforths aren't being liked by today's cricket-lovers, somehow (or they don't want to vote for nineteenth century cricketers, which is not true as Grace is at no. 6 in the batsman's thread)

 

[adharcric]

Wasim - 22
Trueman - 16
Garner - 10
Waqar - 5
Lindwall - 5
Larwood - 3
Laker/Grimmett/Davidson - 2 each
Thomson/Donald/Holding - 1 each