• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Curtly Ambrose vs Sunil Gavaskar

Curtly Ambrose vs Sunil Gavaskar


  • Total voters
    25

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
the same record is considered a liability when it comes to McGrath to be fair.
McGrath is at far less rate of penetration. Steyn until he was injured in his last Aus test was taking 5 WPM. If your WPM and SR are good, it doesn't matter if your average is >25.

However Steyn did blow hot and cold vs Aus. I argue his performance in 2009 lost them that series on bowling friendly wickets.
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
the average is what most people do take issue with
Once again, a slightly higher average is fine as long as wickettaking rate is maintained. Rather than like Ambrose taking 13 wickets in 4 tests against SA with a loss average but little match impact.
 

DrWolverine

International Debutant
Not as often as he did against WI & Eng.

He was good against us but do not remember him destroying us like Steyn did against us


Obviously every bowler has few great matches against his worst opponents - Even Donald against Aus
 

Johan

Cricketer Of The Year
Steyn is obviously better against India but doesn't mean McGrath isn't an absolute ATG against India, he averages 18 with a 4.5+ WPM against India ffs
 

Top