Johan
Cricketer Of The Year
Sobers momentCould on 795, if ICC suddenly decides to revoke the Test status of Australia vs RoW XI
Sobers momentCould on 795, if ICC suddenly decides to revoke the Test status of Australia vs RoW XI
They never will – Murali’s 800 is iconic, essentially his brand, and was even the title of his movie! They won’t take that away now.Could on 795, if ICC suddenly decides to revoke the Test status of Australia vs RoW XI
Oh yeah forgot about him too.Muttiah Muralitharan ending up with 799 test wickets would have been fkn crazy
Or Viv with a 49.9 average.Muttiah Muralitharan ending up with 799 test wickets would have been fkn crazy
Viv’s legacy would have taken a serious hitOr Viv with a 49.9 average.
I wouldn’t rate him differently.Viv’s legacy would have taken a serious hit
You wouldn't because you don't rate him anyways.I wouldn’t rate him differently.
To be frank, it's not just 49, even a 50, average seems suspect.the perception of 50 good 49 bad is one of the more annoying things about Cricketing stats.
you'd generally have a much easier time explaining why a dude averaging 51 is better than a dude average 58 than explaining why a dude average 48 is better than a dude averaging 51 thoTo be frank, it's not just 49, even a 50, average seems suspect.
You’d have a harder time convincing me that Hussey is better than Barrington than convincing me that Smith is better than Hussey.you'd generally have a much easier time explaining why a dude averaging 51 is better than a dude average 58 than explaining why a dude average 48 is better than a dude averaging 51 tho
Yeah but you're not the average Cricket fanYou’d have a harder time convincing me that Hussey is better than Barrington than convincing me that Smith is better than Hussey.
It's a dig or a genuine complement?Yeah but you're not the average Cricket fan
obviously a compliment, have you seen how donkey-brained the average person is?It's a dig or a genuine complement?
You meant @zachary?@capt_Luffy You're smart too dw, Narayana is actually high tier among the average Cricket fans.
Yes true.you'd generally have a much easier time explaining why a dude averaging 51 is better than a dude average 58 than explaining why a dude average 48 is better than a dude averaging 51 tho
YesYou meant @zachary?
Don't see how this isn't obvious.averages 20 odd in comparison to Lillee's 24 odd (WSC combined), wrecked stuff up at the home base of the strongest enemy while Lillee averages 30+ in West Indies and had some really weak lineups to feast on in England and New Zealand.
averages lower despite having far less spicy wicketsHow is Ambrose’s record better at home than Donald’s record at home?
Ambrose
52 matches. 203 wickets.
Avg of 21.20. SR of 55.79.
11 5-Fer
Donald
38 matches. 177 wickets.
Avg of 21.64. SR of 45.
12 5-Fer