HouHsiaoHsien
International Debutant
Bumrah has a much higher ceiling than Cummins.
He needs a very high ceiling. If he had a low ceiling he'd hit it with his right arm whenever he practised bowling inside.Bumrah has a much higher ceiling than Cummins.
How silly. Cummins is like 14cm (5 inches) taller.Bumrah has a much higher ceiling than Cummins.
I see you’re moving the goalpostsI still maintain, Bumrah will struggle it seems to reach 300 wickets and Cummins will likely end up with the better career.
Lol that's a strawman. I did a whole thread about appreciating SC pacers at home, remember?Since you don’t consider tests at home to be important, doesn’t Bunrah actually have a greater body of work at five points better average.
You can’t say tests at heme don’t matter for Ashwin and consider them relevant for Cummins or Bumrah.
no one remembers anything you have ever said you wet wipe of a humanLol that's a strawman. I did a whole thread about appreciating SC pacers at home, remember?
Cummins is Shami level away from AusLol that's a strawman. I did a whole thread about appreciating SC pacers at home, remember?
And I always maintained for myself, a modern ATG pacer needs 300 wickets as a test of output to qualify.
Hence even tho Bumrah is a better bowler, if he retired today I would rate Cummins ahead based on output.
Sure. Bumrah is better at present but you need a minimum sample to judge someone as a great.Cummins is Shami level away from Aus
Sure. Bumrah is better at present but you need a minimum sample to judge someone as a great.
In any case your logic is ridiculous, why is home performance irrelevant for Ashwin and not for BumrahSure. Bumrah is better at present but you need a minimum sample to judge someone as a great.
Translation: I am not biased against Bumrah.In any case your logic is ridiculous, why is home performance irrelevant for Ashwin and not for Bumrah
Translation: You are a confused man.Translation: I am not biased against Bumrah.
Saying you need a minimum output isn't really confusing. You just disagree.Translation: You are a confused man.
I believe you need a minimum output. I'm saying Bumrah has a minimum output already as far as away performance goes, and that's all you apparently care aboutSaying you need a minimum output isn't really confusing. You just disagree.
Cummins used to be significantly ahead of Bumrah in WPM. Bumrah has caught up in last 12 months.WPM:-
Pat Cummins= 4.35
Jasprit Bumrah= 4.4047
After 30 matches, Bumrah took 128 wickets iirc. that'd interpret into a WPM of 4.2667. Pat Cummins had a WPM of 4.7273 at that time (208 wickets in 44 matches iirc).Cummins used to be significantly ahead of Bumrah in WPM. Bumrah has caught up in last 12 months.