Fail comment. Most of his runs have come when the top 5 collapsed. He's become Mr. dependable of the last couple of years.helped by quota, wouldn't have played otherwise, better than other quota beneficiaries like ontong though, but definitely made more runs than he should have
not a fail at all, i didn't say he hasn't done well, in fact the opposite, but i can't see him getting as many early chances as he did if not for the quota, like ntini, both those 2 have benefitted from quota and gone on to become seriously good cricketers.Fail comment. Most of his runs have come when the top 5 collapsed. He's become Mr. dependable of the last couple of years.
Thats difficult. Its easier to look for people who are not good enough (in one's opinion) to be playing international cricket and yet play quite a few (Madan Lal, Roger Binny, Rajesh Chauhan etc come to mind from India. But these are people who did not end up with a great record either. The only one I can think of from India who was devoid of great talent and did pretty well is Chetan Chauhan.i knew someone would mention hayden... do you think it's any coincidence his rise to prominence came at the same time that all the best opposition bowlers retired and were replaced with pop gun wielders ?
my idea of the thread is about players who have no right playing test cricket on talent alone, but do, and are quite successful, say a collingwood. not a bunch of blokes with talent oozing from their pores who succeeded, like ponting
what would be more interesting would be the player who has made the least out of their talent, say a craig mcmillan, or a host of englishmen