HeathDavisSpeed
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Wonderful article here from the BBC about Rudie van Vuuren - who took 5 wickets against England at a world cup and also played for Namibia in the rugby world cup. https://www.bbc.com/sport/66996021
This is atrocious. Everything from content to syntax.jim maxwell having a totally normal one re enoch powell
The only penalty possible for 'obstructing the field' (law 37.1) is giving the batsman out. So the law can't apply to anyone who can't be given out because they're not currently batting, which is why you never see drunk crowd members or passing seagulls given out for obstructing the field.UmpireWeb: we had a pretty chippy first day of a two dayer on the weekend and one of my guys (former captain of his old team) raised with me that the batting side’s guys in the pavilion were trying to distract him fielding balls which came to him while in front of them on the rope. based on my reading of the laws, obstruction of the field by distraction only applies to the batsman, and not to members of the batting team in the pavilion imho, which means any grievance he has can only arguably really manifest in nebulous spirit of cricket stuff.
what do you think @Line and Length @cnerd123 @Howe_zat and any others who have Takes?™️
That said, law 42 gives the umpires pretty wide discretion to award penalty runs for general bad behaviour, though IMO you would struggle to argue it's applicable here, unless they were explicitly told to stop it by the umpires previously and carried on.The only penalty possible for 'obstructing the field' (law 37.1) is giving the batsman out. So the law can't apply to anyone who can't be given out because they're not currently batting, which is why you never see drunk crowd members or passing seagulls given out for obstructing the field.
It is something you could complain about off the field, and at a high enough level you could get a match referee to fine some players their match fee or something, but it's not got anything in the laws about it as far as I see.
Where is his head?View attachment 37511
What is going on in this photo
If that situation had occurred when I was umpiring I would have approached the non-batting players and informed them, and their captain in particular, that their behaviour was contrary to the spirit of the game and that if further examples occurred I would have included details in my match report. The association's administrative body at the time often took action against clubs that 'brought the game into disrepute' and the result would have been a hefty fine and possible suspension for the captain for failing to keep his team 'in line'.UmpireWeb: we had a pretty chippy first day of a two dayer on the weekend and one of my guys (former captain of his old team) raised with me that the batting side’s guys in the pavilion were trying to distract him fielding balls which came to him while in front of them on the rope. based on my reading of the laws, obstruction of the field by distraction only applies to the batsman, and not to members of the batting team in the pavilion imho, which means any grievance he has can only arguably really manifest in nebulous spirit of cricket stuff.
what do you think @Line and Length @cnerd123 @Howe_zat and any others who have Takes?™️
why didn’t he bowl at all in the 2nd innings?Was just looking at Shoaib Akhtar's bowling videos. I'd imagine that if his off-field antics were a bit under control, people would've focussed more on some of his legendary spells. This epic performance on a dead pitch is barely talked about:
https://www.espncricinfo.com/series...-vs-new-zealand-1st-test-63989/full-scorecard
He was such an exciting bowler to watch, how lucky are people who witnessed him bowl at The Gabba(I hope one of you was there and can elaborate on that).